From: J.A.J. van Belkum (no email)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 08:34:08 EDT
Just kidding... didn't reeeealy wan't to make it look like a real load
avg...
Your load avg would suggest that you would need 745 more processors to
have the load avg back to 1 Doesn't that scare you??
Cami wrote:
>> | How about this load :P
>> |
>> | 8:20am up 22 days, 17:51, 1 user, load average: 1532,76 987.13,
385.60
>> |
>> | Yes this is real..... :-)
>>
>> If you're going to lie, you might aswell do it properly.. (change
the time/days/uptime :P)
>>
>>
>> | > hey all..
>> | >
>> | > just thought i'd paste this, shows postfix is rock solid, even
under a bit of a high load:
>> | >
>> | > 8:20am up 22 days, 17:51, 1 user, load average: 746.25,
219.13, 75.60
>> | > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU
WHAT
>> | >
>> | > dont ask :P
>> | >
>> | > cheers
>> | > ++C
>>
>>
|
|
|