From: Matthias Andree (no email)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 10:51:05 EST
(Vikki Roemer) writes:
> Yeah, I found that out. But, I found out that it's not a Bad Thing
> like it is with procmail-- the mail just goes back in the queue,
> rather than being bounced.
There is a way to tell procmail to defer the mail, too, but it's
cumbersome to type. After each rule, you'll need something like
:0e
{ EXITCODE=75 HOST }
and you're lost if it bails out for syntax...
> Actually, I'm not noticing that much difference between procmail and
> maildrop, speedwise. Sometimes, it seems that maildrop is faster,
> actually-- but I'm not sure on that. *shrug*
"It depends." On what you do with it.
-- Matthias Andree
|
|
|