From: Wietse Venema (no email)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 09:27:11 EST
Michael Tokarev:
> Wietse, what I'm thinking of is - would it be OK to implement e.g.
> smtpd_commands_maps parameter, where the key is a command received
> by smtpd, and result is TERMINATE to terminate a session, or a reason?
> This way, a generalized framework will be available that replaces
> already existing one (when postfix closes SMTP session when it sees
> email header instead of smtp command).
It is not possible to make a generalized framework for tables with
commands and actions, because the table would be limited to NOOP
and ABORT like actions.
Even worse, there is a problem with specifying a table for non-SMTP
commands, because its user interface would depend on the private
details of how the SMTP command parser tokenizes commands that do
not satisfy SMTP syntax. It's no big deal with commands line "GET"
but it gets hairy with non-SMTP commands like "Reply-To:foobar".
Wietse
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
|
|
|