RE: Using blacklists and RBL's with Postfix

From: Schmehl, Paul L (no email)
Date: Sun Sep 01 2002 - 13:11:09 EDT


I just tested it. That works. Cumulative passes through and cum is
blocked. Good catch. Just change the filter to |cum$|

Paul Schmehl ()
Project Coordinator
University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
AVIEN Founding Member

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schmehl, Paul L
> Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 12:08 PM
> To: Russell Mosemann
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: Using blacklists and RBL's with Postfix
>
>
> Yes, it would match those, so you might not want to use that
> one. Or, you could possibly use it like this |cum$|. (I
> haven't tested that, but I think it should work. Might even
> change mine to match that.)
>
> Paul Schmehl ()
> Project Coordinator
> University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
> AVIEN Founding Member
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Russell Mosemann [mailto:]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 11:41 AM
> > To: Schmehl, Paul L
> > Cc:
> > Subject: RE: Using blacklists and RBL's with Postfix
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Russell Mosemann wrote:
> >
> > > > # Time to kill some spam
> > > >
> > /\b(32\.97\.166\.75|terra\.es|\?subject=REMOVE|SizeMAX|Nigeria|s.?16
> > > > 18|\
> > > > *\*\*\*\*\*\*\*|please\svisit\sour|cum|blowjob|
> > >
> > > Wouldn't this match on the word "document"?
> >
> > Doh! I skipped over the first \b word boundary. So,
> > document should be fine. How about words like "cumulative
> > scores" or "cumbersome methods"?
> >
> > ----
> > Russell Mosemann, Ph.D. * Computing Services * Concordia
> > University, Nebraska "Absence makes the heart grow fonder."
> > "Out of sight, out of mind."
> >
> >
> >
> -
> To unsubscribe, send mail to with
> content (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
>
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users








Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD