Re: How does (disable_)VRFY(_command) work?

From: Ralf Hildebrandt (no email)
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 05:47:15 EDT

• Next message: k clair: "Re: Postfix & SMTP AUTH - OS"
• Previous message: p dont think: "Re: Simplistic (but solid??) smtpd_recipient_restrictions"
• Maybe in reply to: p dont think: "How does (disable_)VRFY(_command) work?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:06:01AM -0700, p dont think wrote:

> What does VRFY verify against?? Unix passwd or shadow or PAM or ..???

local_recipient_maps and virtual_maps

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A)   
Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum                 Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
The Strong Lusethropic Principle states: "The more idiot proof the
software, the more it encourages the user to be careless and not
think. Therefore, idiot-proof software actually encourages,
contributes, and actually CAUSES lusers to be stupid."  
 
The Weak Lusethropic Principle states: "As more idiot-proof software
becomes available, more idiots are able to use computers. Idiot-proof
software did not make or cause computer lusers; it simple allowed
lusers to use computers where they could not before."  
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to  with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users

• Next message: k clair: "Re: Postfix & SMTP AUTH - OS"
• Previous message: p dont think: "Re: Simplistic (but solid??) smtpd_recipient_restrictions"
• Maybe in reply to: p dont think: "How does (disable_)VRFY(_command) work?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]