From: Adrian Bolzan (no email)
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 02:45:23 EDT
On 1 May 2002 at 7:52, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:18:29PM +1000, Adrian Bolzan wrote:
>
> > I like that pronouncement: "doomed". ;-)
> > well, i was going to use a second postfix box as a pseudo-proxy, as
> > suggested in an earlier post by Dr Hildebrandt but thought to use
> > our
>
> Mr., no Dr.
>
well, you never know, and some people are "sensitive" about their titles.
> > firewall's proxy which is, by all accounts, reasonably good.
>
> You're running what? Watchguard (not good), CISCO PIX (not good)
>
> > So, (if I take the proxy out of the equation) then if a groupware
> > server is down, the postfix server will queue the mail until the
> > groupware server is up. If the postfix server is down (not likely
> > but...), then i presume mail will be queued at the secondary MX
> > server at our ISP's.
>
> Yep.
> No mail is lost unless a disk blows up with the queuefiles on it.
>
excellent.
thanks for your time,
adrian
> --
> Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A)
> Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum
> Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze -
> Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 It is better to keep your mouth
> shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, send mail to with content
> (not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
|
|
|