Re: Too stupid for rhsbl?

From: Ralf Hildebrandt (no email)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 01:55:25 EST


On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:52:54AM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:

> Again, it is a - badly - documented feature.
>
> I should have added the description of the max_rhsbl_subdomain parameter
> to the section on RBL/RHSBL lookups and not to the ChangeLog. Sorry,
> I'll correct it.

Thanks.
Anyway: It works now. I'm testing it with the warn_if_reject
restriction, because blocking such hosts/domains like yahoo.de and
aol.com proves to be problematic.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A)   
Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum                 Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
To correct all M$ Windows(tm) problems, only one small command is necessary:
> format C: (then press y) 
Bingo! Your Windows(tm) computer is now secure, stable, and every bit as
useful as before.
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to  with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD