From: Jozsef Kadlecsik (no email)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 01:52:54 EST
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Anyway, the patch is broken. Right now I use:
> ...
> reject_unauth_destination,
> check_recipient_access btree:/etc/postfix/recipient_checks,
> check_sender_access btree:/etc/postfix/sender_checks,
> warn_if_reject
> check_sender_access rhsbl:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain,
> check_client_access btree:/etc/postfix/client_checks,
> reject_invalid_hostname,
> ...
>
> and it's emitting reject_warnings liek crazy, but not for the
>
>
> addresses.
Again, it is a - badly - documented feature.
I should have added the description of the max_rhsbl_subdomain parameter
to the section on RBL/RHSBL lookups and not to the ChangeLog. Sorry,
I'll correct it.
Regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail : ,
WWW-Home: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users
|
|
|