Re: Too stupid for rhsbl?

From: Ralf Hildebrandt (no email)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 15:40:32 EST


On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:31:57PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

> But this breaks the line continuation rule!
>
> check_sender_access btree:/etc/postfix/sender_checks rhsbl:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain
> !=
> check_sender_access btree:/etc/postfix/sender_checks
> rhsbl:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain
>
> ?

Anyway, the patch is broken. Right now I use:
   ...
   reject_unauth_destination,
   check_recipient_access btree:/etc/postfix/recipient_checks,
   check_sender_access btree:/etc/postfix/sender_checks,
   warn_if_reject
   check_sender_access rhsbl:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain,
   check_client_access btree:/etc/postfix/client_checks,
   reject_invalid_hostname,
   ...

and it's emitting reject_warnings liek crazy, but not for the

addresses.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A)   
Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum                 Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
#!/bin/sh
cat <<EOF | dc -e "[lila/sulila%Plusili0<y]sy?si256salyx"
403736150440747681954588245935305944858835839713675044439128476844672\
007875165788798502153167817380873133828163530564
EOF
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to  with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD