Re: verbosity request - or should I use the source?

From: Clifton Royston (no email)
Date: Mon Apr 01 2002 - 15:53:20 EST


On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 02:42:36PM -0500, Yanek Korff wrote:
> I periodically (once a month or so) get complaints from users that their
> mail isn't getting to a recipient, or saying that they've been told mail to
> them has bounced.
...
>
> My question is this: Although -I- feel postfix is clear on why messages are
> rejected, has anyone considered rewriting the error messages in more verbose
> terms, like this:
>
> This is an automated message from the mail system at <company name>. The
> message you sent on <Date stamp> to <recipient> was rejected for the
> following reason:
> <relay access denied> or <sender domain does not resolve> etc
>
> Followed by a paragraph and URLs relating to the error message.
>
> Is this worth doing? Will people read it?

Probably most won't. However, a few may and that would be a few less
calls, which may be worth it.

You are somewhat limited in what you can say, because unless you are
first accepting the mail and then bouncing it back to the sender, you
probably only have the ability to return the single error message from
the SMTP response (and then hope that the SMTP software connecting to
you will bother to pass it back to the sender.)

Currently the József Kadlecsik UCE control patches seem to be my answer
to everything Postfix; but see in particular

  <http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/sw/postfix_patch.html#restr>

for how to customize the SMTP response text to describe the specific
reason you are rejecting a message.

  -- Clifton

-- 
    Clifton Royston  --  LavaNet Systems Architect --  
"What do we need to make our world come alive?  
   What does it take to make us sing?
 While we're waiting for the next one to arrive..." - Sisters of Mercy
-
To unsubscribe, send mail to  with content
(not subject): unsubscribe postfix-users







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD