From: Ted Hardie (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 17 2009 - 18:16:12 EST
Silly question: how well would using 18.104.22.1687.in-addr.arpa match the
need identified in draft-jabley-sink-arpa ?
It seems like it would be equally well guaranteed to be non-existant
(short of change in the def of IPv4 and in-addr.arpa). Like
sink.arpa, it would get you a valid SOA and nothing else.
Am I missing something, or is this operationally equivalent?