RE: IPv6 Addressing Help

From: Ray Burkholder (no email)
Date: Mon Aug 17 2009 - 20:46:45 EDT

  • Next message: Brett Watson: "Re: Anyone else seeing "(invalid or corrupt AS path) 3 bytes E01100" ?"

    >
    > Why is is necessary insist that using bits in a fashion that doesn't
    > require that growth be predicated on requests for additional resources
    > be considered wasteful?
    >

    Don't we still need to subnet in a reasonably small fashion in order to contain broadcasts, ill-behaved machines, and other regular discovery crap that exists on any given segment? And if we have to segment in such a fashion, the request and allocation of additional resources is a natural consequence of such containment.

    -- 
    This message has been scanned for viruses and
    dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
    believed to be clean.
    

  • Next message: Brett Watson: "Re: Anyone else seeing "(invalid or corrupt AS path) 3 bytes E01100" ?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD