Re: Use of Default in the DFZ: banned in philly, see it now on the net!

From: Pete Templin (no email)
Date: Wed Jun 24 2009 - 15:26:50 EDT

  • Next message: Randy Bush: "tor"

    Lixia Zhang wrote:
    >
    > On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Pete Templin wrote:
    >
    >> In (your) theory, your paper may hold up. In practice, your
    >> definition of stub network is most likely considered wrong, and that
    >> likely shifts a lot of the assumptions in your paper.
    >
    > But I also believe that there are a few common practical patterns that
    > cover majority of reality.
    > We need to be mindful of diversity in real world but also capture basic
    > common patterns (I'd agree that the paper perhaps should have said a few
    > more words about the former).

    Skimming the paper turns up a key sentence, "Stub networks, on the other
    hand, do not forward packets for other networks." What part of that led
    you to think that stub networks forward packets for 1-4 downstream ASNs?

    pt


  • Next message: Randy Bush: "tor"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD