- Previous message: Charles Wyble: "Re: First steps towards v6 support by ATT?"
- Maybe in reply to: Charles Wyble: "First steps towards v6 support by ATT?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Christopher Morrow (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 26 2009 - 22:15:42 EDT
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Charles Wyble <> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> yea... maybe they do, I don't see that from my view of 7018's routing
>> data (limited as it may be)
>
> Interesting.
so, actually, looking at 7018's route-server:
route-server> sho ip bgp 192.88.99.1 | in recei
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
7018 1239, (received & used)
seems they prefer Sprint for 6to4 services... 7132 doesn't have a
publicly listed route-server :( oh well.
-chris
|
|
|