North American Network Operators 0902
By Thread

Most recent messages
1272 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: Sun Feb 01 2009 - 00:24:34 EST
Ending: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:09:54 EST

• Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." Chris Mills (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 00:23:06 EST)
  • Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." andrew.wallace (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 00:32:00 EST)
  • Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." Damian Menscher (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 13:56:04 EST)
• Re: can I ask mtu question Michael Dillon (Sun Feb 01 2009 - 09:13:20 EST)
  • Re: can I ask mtu question Bill Stewart (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 05:11:00 EST)
  • Re: can I ask mtu question Sam Stickland (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 07:04:22 EST)
  • Re: can I ask mtu question Niels Bakker (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 11:09:42 EST)
  • Re: can I ask mtu question Sam Stickland (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 11:42:19 EST)
• Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:48:29 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:52:49 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:51:58 EST)
    • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:22:39 EST)
      • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:14:38 EST)
      • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Johnny Eriksson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 18:17:23 EST)
      • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:30:10 EST)
      • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Hallgren (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:50:38 EST)
      • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 21:01:50 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeffrey Ollie (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:57:00 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Butler (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:58:32 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 10:59:13 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Justin M. Streiner (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:04:57 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:07:50 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Greco (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:07:11 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:10:30 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:47:05 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:57:35 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Conrad (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:47:30 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:19:18 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skywing (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:14:54 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TSG (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:21:45 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:03:57 EST)
  • RE: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:18:58 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:20:25 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:38:47 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:44:42 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Meidinger (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:50:49 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Blake Pfankuch (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:58:52 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:59:05 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:59:35 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:06:58 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Andre Sencioles Vitorio Oliveira (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:15:06 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:30:47 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Tico (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:35:29 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:42:05 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:45:28 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Soucy, Ray (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:50:20 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:55:49 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:01:30 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:01:29 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:02:33 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:11:03 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:33:52 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:49:12 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 14:58:21 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:07:11 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:11:03 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:09:14 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:28:33 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Adrian Chadd (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:36:32 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:49:16 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:52:43 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Barak (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 15:53:35 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:40:51 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Colin Alston (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:06:42 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chuck Anderson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 16:31:43 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space MÃ¥ns Nilsson (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:09:42 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Seth Mattinen (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:24:20 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Barker (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 20:42:26 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 21:25:40 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 22:24:03 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Anthony Roberts (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 00:30:00 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 00:35:15 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 00:41:01 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 07:50:56 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 01:01:09 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 07:52:04 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 07:56:21 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 12:39:33 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Zaid Ali (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 13:19:26 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Timmins (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 13:22:16 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Huff (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 13:24:59 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Zaid Ali (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 13:32:48 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 15:50:42 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space MÃ¥ns Nilsson (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 16:18:42 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Huff (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 16:35:06 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 16:59:15 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:03:06 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dave Temkin (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:05:46 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:18:40 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Heather Schiller (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:14:45 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:17:58 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:25:03 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joel Jaeggli (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 02:42:18 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:19:58 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:28:29 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:30:22 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:47:41 EST)
    • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 19:57:36 EST)
      • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:25:37 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Heather Schiller (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:00:51 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:43:21 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Peter J. Cherny (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 19:05:57 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 19:38:16 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 19:59:16 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:29:36 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 17:44:20 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:56:05 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space MÃ¥ns Nilsson (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 18:09:22 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:29:57 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space James R. Cutler (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:35:15 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:19:28 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Maimon (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 15:18:04 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joel Jaeggli (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 02:21:55 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bill Stewart (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:08:50 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 08:40:28 EST)
    • Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:16:04 EST)
• Images from DR and NANOG45 Pete Templin (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 11:06:43 EST)
• Peer Filtering Paul Stewart (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 17:27:11 EST)
  • Re: Peer Filtering Martin Barry (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 20:34:11 EST)
  • Re: Peer Filtering Martin Barry (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 22:22:21 EST)
  • RE: Peer Filtering John van Oppen (Mon Feb 02 2009 - 22:54:20 EST)
  • RE: Peer Filtering Paul Stewart (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 06:12:20 EST)
  • Re: Peer Filtering Nick Hilliard (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 07:11:44 EST)
• FW: News Delivery Report (Failure) Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 17:48:43 EST)
• IPv6 space (was: RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space ) Deepak Jain (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:09:46 EST)
• [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Steve Bertrand (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:33:23 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:40:17 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Steve Bertrand (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:43:32 EST)
  • RE: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Skeeve Stevens (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:53:32 EST)
    • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Steve Bertrand (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 21:10:02 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 20:51:16 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Bill Stewart (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:24:17 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Steve Bertrand (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 03:52:25 EST)
    • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Brad Fleming (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:20:21 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Michael Butler (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 20:23:50 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Nathan Ward (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 20:39:39 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Mark Tinka (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 00:42:53 EST)
  • Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics Mark Tinka (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 00:43:35 EST)
• outblaze contact Jacques Marneweck (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 21:40:17 EST)
• Database backed DNS Management Solutions Ross Dmochowski (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 22:52:44 EST)
  • Re: Database backed DNS Management Solutions Israel Lopez - Lists (Tue Feb 03 2009 - 23:19:54 EST)
  • Re: Database backed DNS Management Solutions fiberOptiC (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 02:19:17 EST)
  • Re: Database backed DNS Management Solutions Michele Neylon :: Blacknight (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 10:10:38 EST)
  • Re: Database backed DNS Management Solutions Steven Crandell (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 16:36:10 EST)
  • Re: Database backed DNS Management Solutions Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 17:50:39 EST)
• Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Scott Howard (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 18:56:44 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:02:56 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:08:13 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Anthony Roberts (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:46:20 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:19:54 EST)
  • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) MÃ¥ns Nilsson (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 00:23:33 EST)
• v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Patrick W. Gilmore (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:16:36 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:38:44 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:57:18 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Anthony Roberts (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:05:18 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:11:01 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:20:30 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Anthony Roberts (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:22:46 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:28:33 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:32:33 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:38:29 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:39:35 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:50:29 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Scott Weeks (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:41:58 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:19:07 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:34:34 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 01:37:00 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 01:59:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 02:34:57 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Owen DeLong (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 03:34:57 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 09:28:29 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 10:25:44 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 10:30:11 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Ricky Beam (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 16:44:58 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] John Osmon (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:06:14 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:18:15 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:42:27 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Joe Maimon (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:00:48 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] James R. Cutler (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:05:43 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Ricky Beam (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:15:02 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:12:19 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:32:56 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] David W. Hankins (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:55:16 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] David W. Hankins (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:01:15 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Sven-Haegar Koch (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:11:13 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] David W. Hankins (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:14:21 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Ricky Beam (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:15:04 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:30:12 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:36:25 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] John Osmon (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:48:48 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] John Osmon (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:54:48 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] George William Herbert (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 20:40:26 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] David W. Hankins (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 21:32:26 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 21:48:24 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Kaufman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 01:50:20 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 03:02:29 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Bjørn Mork (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 04:00:02 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Paul Jakma (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 05:26:30 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 05:42:54 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Jack Bates (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 08:38:25 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:39:01 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:48:53 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Kaufman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:17:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] David W. Hankins (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:59:33 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Stephen Sprunk (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 21:36:53 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 22:12:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 02:09:17 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 02:10:12 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 10:36:14 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Bill Stewart (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 20:17:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 20:56:28 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Scott Howard (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:35:10 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:39:54 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Ricky Beam (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:16:28 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Michael Thomas (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:18:14 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Christopher Morrow (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:20:37 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:08:43 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:17:01 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:38:59 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 18:07:39 EST)
• RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:16:46 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:45:22 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:09:56 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:48:57 EST)
    • Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:00:38 EST)
  • RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW) TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:17:29 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Howard C. Berkowitz (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:38:34 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:33:12 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:35:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:39:39 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Scott Howard (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:35:21 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:51:10 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:52:43 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:56:30 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:14:44 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:29:43 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:38:53 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:40:18 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Brandon Butterworth (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 04:31:28 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 10:41:49 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 11:42:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 11:42:21 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) Stephen Kratzer (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 15:38:44 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 20:56:42 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:04:27 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 21:22:54 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 10:13:09 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Paul Timmins (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 18:14:47 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] John Schnizlein (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:00:12 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Tony Finch (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 08:52:22 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mohacsi Janos (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 06:39:33 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:11:50 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Mark Andrews (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:19:26 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Ricky Beam (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 16:41:41 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:47:15 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Christopher Morrow (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 23:35:53 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:05:22 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:45:38 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Adams (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:58:53 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:39:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:53:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Martin Hannigan (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 00:14:02 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Christopher Morrow (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 01:40:06 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 01:40:18 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mohacsi Janos (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 03:47:48 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 11:24:16 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 12:19:59 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 13:38:08 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Abley (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 14:06:16 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 14:13:35 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Iljitsch van Beijnum (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 14:59:43 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Brandon Butterworth (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 15:05:13 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:44:22 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 17:58:47 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:21:12 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 21:20:40 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Moyle-Croft (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 22:06:50 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 22:32:10 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 00:14:51 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 14:31:57 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:11:25 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:32:56 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:01:25 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 20:00:17 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Newton (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:39:52 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Kaufman (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:00:12 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:24:51 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 17:44:45 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Newton (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:33:41 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:47:11 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Newton (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 18:58:47 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:22:58 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 19:33:54 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Seth Mattinen (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:24:13 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Kaufman (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 22:45:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space John Osmon (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 00:54:21 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 01:11:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Scott Howard (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 01:24:03 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mohacsi Janos (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:21:27 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 05:21:46 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 22:41:07 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 07:41:01 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Marshall Eubanks (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 07:47:51 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Christopher Morrow (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 09:34:16 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:16:49 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space John Peach (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:19:40 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:27:59 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jack Bates (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:38:33 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 22:16:10 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:03:40 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Frank Bulk - iName.com (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:54:43 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 22:25:17 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 08:29:38 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 08:52:31 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space John Curran (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 15:22:36 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 08:57:28 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 09:06:31 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 16:30:26 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space John Curran (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:56:15 EST)
• Seeking FIOS tech support with two (or more) brain cells Robert E. Seastrom (Wed Feb 04 2009 - 23:45:50 EST)
  • Re: Seeking FIOS tech support with two (or more) brain cells Robert E. Seastrom (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 15:06:44 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] (IPv6-MW) TJ (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 07:30:56 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Robert D. Scott (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 19:19:37 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] TJ (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 21:52:45 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Randy Bush (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 01:00:59 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Andy Davidson (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:40:36 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Simon Lyall (Thu Feb 05 2009 - 21:59:54 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Matthew Kaufman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 01:43:38 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space (IPv6-MW)] Daniel Senie (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 14:54:02 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Paul Vixie (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 02:20:01 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Joe Loiacono (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 08:35:00 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Jack Bates (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 08:51:04 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Stephen Kratzer (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:20:50 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Tim Durack (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 09:28:02 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Joe Loiacono (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:02:42 EST)
    • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:14:33 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Tim Durack (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:07:28 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Matthew Kaufman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:08:06 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Jack Bates (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:09:03 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:22:30 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Jack Bates (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:50:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems James R. Cutler (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:00:52 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems David W. Hankins (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:15:45 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Jack Bates (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 15:37:00 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems David W. Hankins (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 16:29:54 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Owen DeLong (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 17:01:55 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Nathan Ward (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 01:51:36 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems (no name) (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 10:43:46 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 10:59:16 EST)
  • Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems David W. Hankins (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 13:51:35 EST)
• BGP Update Report (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 06:00:05 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 06:00:03 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space(IPv6-MW)] Jamie Bowden (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:22:07 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space(IPv6-MW)] TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 11:43:48 EST)
• Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space(IPv6-MW)] Christopher Morrow (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 10:54:41 EST)
• L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:01:12 EST)
  • RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Wallace Keith (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:35:47 EST)
  • RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:05:41 EST)
  • RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 14:51:06 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? William Allen Simpson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 16:04:18 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Stuart Henderson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 17:57:47 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Nicolas Hyvernat (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 19:43:02 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Stephen Stuart (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 19:51:31 EST)
  • RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 12:03:39 EST)
    • RE: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Peter Beckman (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 15:10:15 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Mark Andrews (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:00:09 EST)
  • Re: L3: Google from DC via the Netherlands? Joe Greco (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:58:10 EST)
• One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:29:28 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Joe Provo (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:33:21 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:32:24 EST)
    • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Daniel Rogers (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:43:00 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Steve Bertrand (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:52:41 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:06:35 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:08:53 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:12:06 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:14:52 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:19:05 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:20:16 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:22:51 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:24:53 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Steve Bertrand (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:18:23 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:29:29 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:31:05 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:40:55 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Dorn Hetzel (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 12:41:12 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Joe Maimon (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:13:14 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:20:14 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Steve Bertrand (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:31:34 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Leo Bicknell (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:45:20 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP William Allen Simpson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 15:58:19 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Leo Bicknell (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 16:15:53 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Elmar K. Bins (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 06:16:44 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 11:31:26 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Steve Gibbard (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 16:23:19 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Andy Davidson (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 12:46:05 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:22:56 EST)
  • RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:34:19 EST)
  • RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Paul Stewart (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:50:11 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Seth Mattinen (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:06:57 EST)
  • RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:24:20 EST)
  • RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:40:35 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:48:54 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Seth Mattinen (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:58:54 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 19:01:42 EST)
    • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Anton Kapela (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 03:25:29 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Francois Menard (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:41:41 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Francois Menard (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:44:44 EST)
  • Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Brandon Galbraith (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 12:45:02 EST)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:17:33 EST)
• Networking performance Deric Kwok (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:43:59 EST)
  • RE: Networking performance Mills, Charles (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:46:35 EST)
  • Re: Networking performance Joel Jaeggli (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 13:59:29 EST)
  • Re: Networking performance Patrick W. Gilmore (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 14:17:05 EST)
  • RE: Networking performance Justin Krejci (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:17:25 EST)
• From San Jose to Google.com - via Europe Paul Ferguson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 18:35:54 EST)
  • Re: From San Jose to Google.com - via Europe Tony Rall (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 18:51:42 EST)
  • Re: From San Jose to Google.com - via Europe Paul Ferguson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 18:55:49 EST)
  • Re: From San Jose to Google.com - via Europe Paul Ferguson (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 19:11:15 EST)
  • RE: From San Jose to Google.com - via Europe Robert D. Scott (Fri Feb 06 2009 - 19:15:37 EST)
• IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 02:45:00 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Nathan Ward (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 03:28:31 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Jack Bates (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 12:16:17 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers John Lee (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 12:30:41 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 13:12:49 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers John Lee (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 14:24:58 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 17:16:32 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Pekka Savola (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:05:25 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:20:41 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 09:21:24 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 10:13:36 EST)
  • FW: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 10:54:41 EST)
    • Re: FW: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 11:08:50 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 13:58:43 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 14:29:09 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 13:59:52 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 21:53:37 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 02:02:36 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 09:01:08 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Marshall Eubanks (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 09:15:42 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space(IPv6-MW)] TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 11:37:22 EST)
• RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 11:54:52 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 14:58:08 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems TJ (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 15:19:22 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems TJ (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 17:24:08 EST)
  • RE: v6 & DSL / Cable modems TJ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 08:54:00 EST)
• 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Jeff S Wheeler (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 21:24:30 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Jeffrey Lyon (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 23:06:28 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Tim Eberhard (Sat Feb 07 2009 - 23:18:53 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 00:38:10 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless James Hess (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 04:32:51 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Eliot Lear (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 08:09:36 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Jaeggli (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 10:04:26 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Esler (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 10:19:10 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Leo Bicknell (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 11:32:04 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Alexander Harrowell (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 12:05:50 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Brandon Butterworth (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 14:18:22 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Eliot Lear (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:45:51 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Steven M. Bellovin (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:58:17 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Aaron Glenn (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 17:37:31 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Jeff S Wheeler (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 16:32:41 EST)
  • RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Buhrmaster, Gary (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 18:33:11 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Mark Andrews (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 19:07:52 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Aaron Glenn (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 22:37:08 EST)
  • RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Frank Bulk (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 22:47:37 EST)
    • RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Skywing (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 23:19:20 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless David Conrad (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 23:10:51 EST)
  • RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Skywing (Sun Feb 08 2009 - 23:22:29 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:08:54 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:11:58 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Christopher Morrow (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:14:25 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Mike Leber (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:38:41 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Ben Scott (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 09:30:29 EST)
  • RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Holmes,David A (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 12:31:53 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 10:40:47 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Matthias Leisi (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:31:38 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:37:46 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Chuck Anderson (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:39:11 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:52:52 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:57:49 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 18:00:37 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 18:29:01 EST)
  • Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Scott Howard (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 18:41:53 EST)
• Packet Loss between Qwest and Global Crossing Andris Kalnozols (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:59:37 EST)
  • Re: Packet Loss between Qwest and Global Crossing Andris Kalnozols (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 03:44:06 EST)
  • Re: Packet Loss between Qwest and Global Crossing Dave Temkin (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 12:49:18 EST)
  • Re: Packet Loss between Qwest and Global Crossing Morgan Miskell (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 13:37:17 EST)
• Automatic Switches? Seth Mattinen (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 02:32:49 EST)
  • Re: Automatic Switches? Seth Mattinen (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 02:58:18 EST)
  • Re: Automatic Switches? Joe Greco (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 22:19:13 EST)
• Network equipments process utilization Á¤Ä¡¿µ (Mon Feb 09 2009 - 20:29:44 EST)
  • Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:39:44 EST)
  • Re: Network equipments process utilization Hank Nussbacher (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 03:51:49 EST)
  • Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 04:00:58 EST)
  • Re: Network equipments process utilization Adam Armstrong (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 04:51:58 EST)
  • Re: Network equipments process utilization Elmar K. Bins (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 04:56:07 EST)
• New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC Alex Le Heux (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 11:07:27 EST)
• Is whois.apnic.net down? Dale Carstensen (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 11:45:03 EST)
  • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? Dale Carstensen (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 11:48:21 EST)
    • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? Brandon Galbraith (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 11:52:03 EST)
    • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? (IPv6-MW) Scott Howard (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 12:12:36 EST)
      • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? (IPv6-MW) (no name) (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 15:43:00 EST)
      • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? (IPv6-MW) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 21:43:28 EST)
  • RE: Is whois.apnic.net down? Dave Larter (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 11:49:33 EST)
  • Re: Is whois.apnic.net down? Matthew Palmer (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 12:04:12 EST)
• [NANOG-announce] NANOG45 Updates Betty J. Burke (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 15:05:57 EST)
• Re: BGP Session Teardown due to AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE in AS4_PATH Eloy Paris (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 16:43:06 EST)
• unsolicited name transfers from Godaddy Zaid Ali (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 17:07:09 EST)
• World famous cabling disasters? joe mcguckin (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 22:16:39 EST)
  • Re: World famous cabling disasters? Justin M. Streiner (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 22:24:30 EST)
  • Re: World famous cabling disasters? Patrick W. Gilmore (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 22:29:44 EST)
  • RE: World famous cabling disasters? Randy Epstein (Tue Feb 10 2009 - 23:33:39 EST)
  • Re: World famous cabling disasters? Elmar K. Bins (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 03:47:02 EST)
  • RE: World famous cabling disasters? Bailey Stephen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 05:18:03 EST)
  • Re: World famous cabling disasters? Steve Church (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:07:47 EST)
  • RE: World famous cabling disasters? Jamie Bowden (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:26:56 EST)
  • Re: World famous cabling disasters? Derek Morton (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 00:47:53 EST)
  • RE: World famous cabling disasters? Frank Bulk - iName.com (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:36:23 EST)
• Call for data: IPv6 enabled service logfiles for analysis George Michaelson (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 06:46:11 EST)
• Network diagram software Mathias Wolkert (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 08:06:09 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Colin Alston (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 08:08:51 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software William Warren (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 08:10:18 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Malte von dem Hagen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 08:12:04 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Joe Provo (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 08:17:38 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Chris Meidinger (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:04:04 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Ross Vandegrift (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:42:06 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software David Andersen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:48:24 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Malte von dem Hagen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 09:51:43 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Brad Fleming (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:06:20 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Mathias Wolkert (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:11:38 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Bill Woodcock (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:27:35 EST)
  • RE: Network diagram software Stephens, Josh (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:28:48 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Min (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:26:25 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software chuck goolsbee (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 10:51:19 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Adam Fields (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 11:00:18 EST)
  • RE: Network diagram software Howard C. Berkowitz (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 11:11:36 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Brian Feeny (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:07:49 EST)
  • RE: Network diagram software Ray Burkholder (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:19:31 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Amit Kaushal (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:30:35 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Ken A (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 13:03:11 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Craig Holland (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 15:50:32 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Jason Dearborn (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:51:01 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software John Osmon (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 13:13:34 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Kevin Day (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 14:15:59 EST)
  • RE: Network diagram software Howard C. Berkowitz (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 14:37:28 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Marshall Eubanks (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 14:43:16 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software seph (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 15:13:04 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Malte von dem Hagen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:34:38 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Michael Hallgren (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:51:40 EST)
      • Re: Network diagram software Michael Hallgren (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:56:25 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Malte von dem Hagen (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:11:17 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software (no name) (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:15:41 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Gary E. Miller (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:21:37 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Chris Garcia (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:44:09 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Crist Clark (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 20:30:17 EST)
  • Re: Network diagram software Tim Chown (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 03:40:26 EST)
    • Re: Network diagram software Randy Bush (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 04:57:59 EST)
  • RE: Network diagram software nanog) Brian Battle (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:02:20 EST)
• XKL Sutterfield, Brian (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 11:33:48 EST)
  • Re: XKL isabel dias (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:05:08 EST)
  • RE: XKL isabel dias (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:15:21 EST)
  • Re: XKL (no name) (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:43:37 EST)
  • Re: XKL Azher Mughal (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 16:45:06 EST)
• J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Brad Fleming (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 12:57:01 EST)
  • Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Giuliano (UOL) (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 22:22:52 EST)
  • Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Chuck Anderson (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 07:19:27 EST)
  • Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Mustafa Golam - (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 07:34:57 EST)
• RE: XKL- after a brainstorming session ? isabel dias (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:07:05 EST)
• Cogent Question - Increments Question Paul Stewart (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:30:29 EST)
  • RE: Cogent Question - Increments Question Paul Stewart (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 18:48:39 EST)
  • RE: Cogent Question - Increments Question Paul Stewart (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 19:09:08 EST)
  • Re: Cogent Question - Increments Question Jeffrey Lyon (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 19:13:59 EST)
  • RE: Cogent Question - Increments Question Paul Stewart (Wed Feb 11 2009 - 19:19:23 EST)
  • Re: Cogent Question - Increments Question Edward B. DREGER (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:49:12 EST)
• Dark Fiber David Schreiber (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:00:58 EST)
• Looking for someone to bounce some Fore questions off of Jason Lixfeld (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 17:08:42 EST)
  • Re: Looking for someone to bounce some Fore questions off of Fouant, Stefan (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:18:49 EST)
  • RE: Looking for someone to bounce some Fore questions off of John Lee (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 21:44:16 EST)
• Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Fernando Gont (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 18:50:02 EST)
  • Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Barry Shein (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 17:01:21 EST)
  • Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Fernando Gont (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 17:39:49 EST)
• ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION THOM, RAY, ATTCORP (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 19:33:19 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Quinn Kuzmich (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 19:49:16 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Ted Cooper (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:00:42 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:01:44 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Jim Popovitch (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:05:29 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:08:09 EST)
  • Re: ANTI-TERRORIST AND MONITARY CRIMES DIVISION Jim Popovitch (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 20:32:02 EST)
• ICANN NomCom call for SOIs for Board/Leadership positions Rodney Joffe (Thu Feb 12 2009 - 21:51:02 EST)
• BGP Update Report (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 06:00:04 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 06:00:01 EST)
• Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 09:57:32 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:00:10 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Randy Bush (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:03:44 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:07:45 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:10:48 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 10:50:29 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service (no name) (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:28:57 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Suresh Ramasubramanian (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:34:06 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jack Bates (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:41:12 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:41:41 EST)
    • Re: Global Blackhole Service Ricardo Oliveira (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:39:05 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Paul Vixie (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 11:57:24 EST)
  • RE: Global Blackhole Service Skywing (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:08:29 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:15:53 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:16:44 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:18:00 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jack Bates (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:22:30 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:29:18 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Tico (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:29:06 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jack Bates (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:31:16 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Paul Vixie (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:35:38 EST)
  • RE: Global Blackhole Service Barry Raveendran Greene (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:53:17 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Chris Jester (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 12:56:50 EST)
  • RE: Global Blackhole Service Barry Raveendran Greene (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:03:38 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jack Bates (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:04:49 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:44:34 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Christopher Morrow (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 14:59:01 EST)
  • RE: Global Blackhole Service Jake Mertel (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:12:55 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Florian Weimer (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:59:48 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Randy Bush (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:41:50 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service John Kristoff (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 12:50:17 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Paul Vixie (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 17:07:11 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Florian Weimer (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 17:43:58 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Patrick W. Gilmore (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 17:45:11 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 19:02:35 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Paul Vixie (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 19:40:27 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 03:18:45 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Randy Bush (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 03:57:02 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Michael Thomas (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 13:46:05 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Marshall Eubanks (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 14:14:42 EST)
  • Re: Global Blackhole Service Justin Shore (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 18:09:49 EST)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:17:47 EST)
• TeliaSonera AS1299 German Martinez (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:00:15 EST)
• Dark Fiber in Parker Arizona Holmes,David A (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 14:55:03 EST)
• anyone knows about extreme switch ann kok (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 15:31:01 EST)
  • RE: anyone knows about extreme switch LEdouard Louis (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 16:11:09 EST)
  • RE: anyone knows about extreme switch ann kok (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 17:30:41 EST)
  • RE: anyone knows about extreme switch LEdouard Louis (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 17:37:32 EST)
• Chicago Sprint convulsions? neal rauhauser (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:18:30 EST)
• Happy 1234567890 everyone! Steve Church (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:49:49 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Ravi Pina (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:54:54 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Wayne E. Bouchard (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 18:58:56 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Chris Adams (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:03:20 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Nathan Malynn (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:06:27 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Chris Adams (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:33:56 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Eric Gearhart (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 20:34:27 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Joe Greco (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 21:23:42 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Chris Adams (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 22:08:12 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Steven M. Bellovin (Fri Feb 13 2009 - 22:11:40 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Mark Andrews (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 03:15:12 EST)
  • Re: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Florian Weimer (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 08:01:12 EST)
  • RE: Happy 1234567890 everyone! Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 08:09:14 EST)
• Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 07:25:23 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Lee (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 07:51:22 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Florian Weimer (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 07:55:02 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 08:09:33 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 08:48:53 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Nickola Kolev (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:18:54 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:26:22 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Lee (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 09:57:13 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 10:11:01 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Lee (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 10:24:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 10:26:44 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 12:42:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Florian Weimer (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 12:55:59 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Mikael Abrahamsson (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 12:57:33 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 14:05:38 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 14:07:27 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Allen Smith (Sat Feb 14 2009 - 15:43:15 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 04:24:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Mathias Wolkert (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 05:10:44 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Chris (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 06:18:04 EST)
  • Re: Linux Router: TCP slow, UDP fast Geert Bosch (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 07:38:23 EST)
• cogent issues John Martinez (Sun Feb 15 2009 - 16:48:12 EST)
  • Re: cogent issues Michal Krsek (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:46:14 EST)
  • Re: cogent issues neal rauhauser (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 14:13:51 EST)
  • Re: cogent issues Ran Liebermann (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 14:38:12 EST)
  • Re: cogent issues Marshall Eubanks (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 15:06:47 EST)
• Capture problems with Intel quad cards? John A. Kilpatrick (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 00:35:30 EST)
  • Re: Capture problems with Intel quad cards? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:39:18 EST)
  • RE: Capture problems with Intel quad cards? Murphy, Jay, DOH (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 16:47:39 EST)
  • RE: Capture problems with Intel quad cards? Murphy, Jay, DOH (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 17:17:07 EST)
  • Re: Capture problems with Intel quad cards? Bill Bogstad (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 18:01:02 EST)
  • Re: Capture problems with Intel quad cards? Andreas Ott (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 00:46:09 EST)
• 3/11 (invalid or corrupt AS path) Ozar (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 11:52:29 EST)
  • Re: 3/11 (invalid or corrupt AS path) (no name) (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 11:56:14 EST)
  • Re: 3/11 (invalid or corrupt AS path) Dave Israel (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:03:17 EST)
• anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Matt Liotta (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 11:55:27 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Ponter, James (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 11:59:55 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? John van Oppen (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:01:24 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Andy Davidson (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:10:22 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? neal rauhauser (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:16:22 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? John van Oppen (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:24:53 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jake Mertel (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:35:09 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jon Lewis (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:43:10 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Tomas Caslavsky (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:49:01 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Leland E. Vandervort (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:53:00 EST)
    • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? John van Oppen (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:57:18 EST)
    • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jon Lewis (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:00:39 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jon Lewis (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:02:23 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jared Mauch (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:03:09 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Leland E. Vandervort (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:03:57 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 13:03:58 EST)
    • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Adam Greene (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 19:26:23 EST)
      • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Michael Ulitskiy (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 23:51:20 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Paul Ferguson (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 00:01:30 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jason Kalai Arasu (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 00:03:59 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Hank Nussbacher (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 01:07:36 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jens Ott - PlusServer AG (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 04:01:52 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Florian Weimer (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 09:55:38 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jared Mauch (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 10:05:55 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Etaoin Shrdlu (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 10:21:07 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Adrian Chadd (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 10:34:03 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Michael Ulitskiy (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 11:07:12 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Hank Nussbacher (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 11:10:24 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? German Martinez (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:54:34 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Mike Lewinski (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:02:50 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? German Martinez (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:20:59 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jack Bates (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:19:00 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Ivan Pepelnjak (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:24:38 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jack Bates (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:31:02 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Mike Lewinski (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:44:04 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Ivan Pepelnjak (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:50:42 EST)
  • RE: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Ivan Pepelnjak (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:58:48 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Steven Saner (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:05:35 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? German Martinez (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:16:55 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Rodney Dunn (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:11:57 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Jack Bates (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 16:25:56 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Leland E. Vandervort (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:06:40 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? German Martinez (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:31:49 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Rodney Dunn (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:27:01 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Rodney Dunn (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:15:02 EST)
  • Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Rodney Dunn (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 11:39:54 EST)
• Littering the global BGP - AS 47868 Ran Liebermann (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 11:52:35 EST)
• Looking for GBLX contact + check your ACL for 66.249.96.0/20 please :) Swen Wulf (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 18:09:41 EST)
• Shadowserver - ASN & Netblock Alerting & Reporting Service Andre' M. DiMino (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 23:53:21 EST)
• Announcing GCTIP - New Forums for Internet Transparency, Performance, and ISP Issues Lauren Weinstein (Mon Feb 16 2009 - 23:55:22 EST)
• IP DSLAMs Church, Charles (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 10:13:15 EST)
• IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 11:59:28 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mohacsi Janos (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 12:21:24 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 12:35:38 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Fred Baker (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:04:26 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Scott Howard (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:26:33 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:32:26 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:40:50 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 13:57:36 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:28:11 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 14:48:49 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:20:19 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 16:05:08 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Joe Provo (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:02:07 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 19:03:10 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:24:26 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:32:03 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:45:44 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:49:08 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 15:54:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 16:30:04 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:14:57 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 17:17:13 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 22:47:34 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 18:50:34 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 18:55:30 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion (no name) (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 19:42:15 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 20:20:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 19:05:25 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 20:21:25 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 20:57:35 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:18:33 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Steven Lisson (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 21:04:59 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 21:19:10 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 21:23:37 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Brandon Galbraith (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 21:27:44 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 21:45:33 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 22:07:06 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Brandon Galbraith (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 22:13:59 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 22:16:47 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Steven Lisson (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:03:07 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Skywing (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:03:25 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:12:32 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Zaid Ali (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:40:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Tue Feb 17 2009 - 23:49:52 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 00:08:21 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 00:09:11 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 00:24:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 00:40:07 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 01:18:51 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 02:18:17 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 02:32:50 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 02:41:08 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 04:12:28 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Freedman (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 09:05:19 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 09:14:07 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 09:23:34 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 12:57:12 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:19:51 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:05:50 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Dave Pooser (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:58:19 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:39:04 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:45:46 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:51:48 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:53:41 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 14:55:19 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:08:54 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:10:57 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:15:05 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:17:56 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:18:51 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:22:03 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:22:04 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:23:59 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:26:30 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:29:22 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:34:06 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:39:10 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Michael Thomas (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:39:20 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:42:05 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:44:38 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:52:29 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:53:54 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:55:09 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 15:57:09 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:00:48 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Dale W. Carder (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:05:43 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:07:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:08:04 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:11:40 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Joel Jaeggli (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:11:36 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:13:50 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 02:27:16 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:15:53 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:20:59 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:29:27 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:36:13 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:39:57 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:46:15 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:11:01 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Daniel Senie (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:13:08 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 21:46:34 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Joel Jaeggli (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 16:55:07 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:06:10 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:11:00 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:20:41 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:21:30 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Michael Dillon (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:29:53 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:30:38 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Christopher Morrow (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:44:09 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:32:24 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:40:02 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:39:24 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Stephen Sprunk (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:45:13 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:50:54 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Joel Jaeggli (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:57:48 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:00:34 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jeff S Wheeler (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:26:27 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Marshall Eubanks (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:35:58 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:37:30 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:45:47 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 19:03:27 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Barak (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 19:05:14 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 19:50:55 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 20:57:53 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 21:52:26 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Merike Kaeo (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 21:58:08 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 22:10:35 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 02:03:28 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 02:55:15 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 06:07:29 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 06:15:13 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 06:23:05 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 08:42:15 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Bob Snyder (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 22:35:32 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 07:03:00 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion David Freedman (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 07:41:33 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Ralph Droms (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 08:41:49 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Tim Chown (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 08:57:39 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Sandy Murphy (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:56:35 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Jared Mauch (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:01:59 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Soucy, Ray (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:16:57 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:19:19 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Sandy Murphy (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:18:57 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Steven M. Bellovin (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:23:14 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Marshall Eubanks (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:01:30 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Mohacsi Janos (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:18:13 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:48:42 EST)
    • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:09:49 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:59:12 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 13:23:44 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:54:24 EST)
  • RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 22:15:41 EST)
    • RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 00:44:08 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 00:49:50 EST)
  • Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:55:25 EST)
• Cisco NOS Bryant Valencia (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 09:51:21 EST)
  • Re: Cisco NOS Anton Kapela (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 10:28:11 EST)
• McAfee/AT&T Issue Calhoun, Matthew (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 12:58:33 EST)
  • Re: McAfee/AT&T Issue kris foster (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:02:24 EST)
  • Re: McAfee/AT&T Issue Kameron Gasso (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:03:26 EST)
  • RE: McAfee/AT&T Issue Justin Krejci (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:14:41 EST)
  • RE: McAfee/AT&T Issue Calhoun, Matthew (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 13:25:02 EST)
  • RE: McAfee/AT&T Issue Scott Weeks (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:10:40 EST)
• Greedy Routing Rod Beck (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:12:02 EST)
  • Re: Greedy Routing (no name) (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 17:35:15 EST)
  • RE: Greedy Routing Deepak Jain (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:01:06 EST)
  • RE: Greedy Routing Jake Mertel (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 18:39:44 EST)
• more AS prepend antics? neal rauhauser (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 21:06:55 EST)
  • Re: more AS prepend antics? Hank Nussbacher (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 00:37:15 EST)
    • Re: more AS prepend antics? neal rauhauser (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 00:54:14 EST)
  • Re: more AS prepend antics? Scott Weeks (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 13:34:00 EST)
• Re: Greedy routing Brighten Godfrey (Wed Feb 18 2009 - 22:09:33 EST)
• issues with msn Carlos Alcantar (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 01:30:08 EST)
  • Re: issues with msn (no name) (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 01:33:38 EST)
• Single fiber 10Gb/s X2 or Xenpak transceiver Andrey Slastenov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 04:06:26 EST)
  • RE: Single fiber 10Gb/s X2 or Xenpak transceiver Holmes,David A (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:49:15 EST)
  • Re: Single fiber 10Gb/s X2 or Xenpak transceiver Jean (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:23:10 EST)
• single fiber 10Gb/s X2 or Xenpak transceiver Andrey Slastenov (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 05:18:29 EST)
  • RE: single fiber 10Gb/s X2 or Xenpak transceiver Vernon Leonard (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:19:43 EST)
• RE: IPv6 Confusion (back to technical conversation) TJ (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 06:34:39 EST)
• real hardware router VS linux router Deric Kwok (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:30:16 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Ryan Harden (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:37:13 EST)
  • RE: real hardware router VS linux router Bruce Grobler (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:37:42 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Colin Alston (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:44:50 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Justin Wilson - MTIN (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:56:03 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router mike (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:05:46 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router David E. Smith (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:43:06 EST)
  • RE: real hardware router VS linux router Bill Blackford (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:54:34 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Jack Bates (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:08:07 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Patrick W. Gilmore (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:23:33 EST)
  • RE: real hardware router VS linux router Ray Burkholder (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:30:25 EST)
    • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 14:30:45 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Joel Jaeggli (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:58:24 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Ingo Flaschberger (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:15:42 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Steve Bertrand (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 14:02:24 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router William Warren (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:09:31 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Bill Nash (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:30:52 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router (no name) (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:47:27 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Steve Bertrand (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 09:43:53 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router mike (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:56:14 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Joe Greco (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:59:24 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Brandon Galbraith (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 19:01:52 EST)
  • RE: real hardware router VS linux router Bailey Stephen (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 03:51:51 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Nathan Ward (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 04:16:05 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router William Hamilton (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 04:51:04 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 14:29:02 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Chris Adams (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:16:44 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Jack Bates (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:40:54 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Eric Gearhart (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 20:32:34 EST)
  • hardware choices (Re: real hardware router VS linux router) Edward B. DREGER (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:21:01 EST)
    • Re: hardware choices (Re: real hardware router VS linux router) Josh Potter (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 17:57:48 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:27:26 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Adrian Chadd (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:42:15 EST)
  • Re: real hardware router VS linux router Nathan Ward (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 03:52:09 EST)
• Network SLA Saqib Ilyas (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 10:50:17 EST)
  • RE: Network SLA Andreas, Rich (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 11:59:11 EST)
  • RE: Network SLA isabel dias (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:27:33 EST)
  • Re: Network SLA david raistrick (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:30:55 EST)
  • RE: Network SLA Holmes,David A (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:51:44 EST)
  • Re: Network SLA Stefan (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:16:42 EST)
  • Re: Network SLA Zartash Uzmi (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 03:19:31 EST)
• do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:09:37 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Jon Lewis (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:17:17 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Darren Bolding (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:15:40 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Bruce Robertson (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:07:31 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:19:02 EST)
    • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Bruce Robertson (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:19:42 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:31:27 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Heather Schiller (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:21:13 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Randy Bush (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:30:40 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Zaid Ali (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:48:37 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Leo Vegoda (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 19:01:59 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Joe Provo (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 06:58:06 EST)
  • Re: do I need to maintain with RADB? Paul Wall (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:23:58 EST)
• lots of prepends Mikael Abrahamsson (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:20:48 EST)
  • RE: lots of prepends Paul Stewart (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:24:27 EST)
  • Re: lots of prepends Seth Mattinen (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:50:11 EST)
  • RE: lots of prepends Paul Stewart (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:54:47 EST)
  • Re: lots of prepends Tomas Caslavsky (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:29:08 EST)
  • Re: lots of prepends Randy Bush (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 17:57:57 EST)
• (no subject) kb3ien+ (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:43:24 EST)
• Appropriate list for Linux routers (was: real hardware router VS linux router) Brian Keefer (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:10:38 EST)
  • Re: Appropriate list for Linux routers (was: real hardware router VS linux router) Adrian Chadd (Thu Feb 19 2009 - 18:22:03 EST)
• BGP Update Report (no name) (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 06:00:06 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 06:00:01 EST)
• Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Giuliano Peritore (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 06:15:38 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Tomas Caslavsky (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 06:29:25 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Jon Lewis (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:00:46 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Dorn Hetzel (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:51:26 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Mikael Abrahamsson (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:05:48 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Mathias Sundman (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:58:36 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Dorn Hetzel (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:46:24 EST)
  • RE: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Ivan Pepelnjak (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 10:35:31 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Dorn Hetzel (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 10:56:56 EST)
  • Re: Lots of prepends - AS20912 case Andree Toonk (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 13:42:04 EST)
• Any twitter admins here? ed (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 07:58:11 EST)
  • Re: Any twitter admins here? Jeremy Gaddis (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:07:24 EST)
  • Re: Any twitter admins here? ed (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:11:35 EST)
  • Re: Any twitter admins here? Brandon Butterworth (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 08:52:09 EST)
• Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Joe Maimon (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:35:35 EST)
  • Re: Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Charles Gucker (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 12:00:24 EST)
  • Re: Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Joe Maimon (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 16:12:11 EST)
  • Re: Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Kevin Blackham (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:52:03 EST)
  • Re: Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Joe Maimon (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 16:34:08 EST)
  • Re: Comprehensive community Guideline and Policies for an AS Richard A Steenbergen (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 18:58:41 EST)
• external L2 ethernet connections Joe Maimon (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:41:37 EST)
  • RE: external L2 ethernet connections Paul Stewart (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:48:21 EST)
  • Re: external L2 ethernet connections isabel dias (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:55:38 EST)
  • Re: external L2 ethernet connections Adam Davenport (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 09:59:00 EST)
    • Re: external L2 ethernet connections Paul Wall (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:21:50 EST)
  • Re: external L2 ethernet connections Joe Maimon (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 10:07:16 EST)
  • Re: external L2 ethernet connections isabel dias (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 10:17:39 EST)
  • RE: external L2 ethernet connections Holmes,David A (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 12:47:28 EST)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 13:18:28 EST)
• sorta-OT graph snmp values Scott Weeks (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 14:40:06 EST)
  • Re: sorta-OT graph snmp values Ken A (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:17:51 EST)
  • Re: sorta-OT graph snmp values Brian Epstein (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 16:26:56 EST)
• Trying to contact MSN/hotmail/microsoft admin Dale Rumph (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:09:56 EST)
• Comcast Abuse Contact Jonathan H. Rosenson (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:24:01 EST)
• Followup: anyone else seeing very long AS paths? Ivan Pepelnjak (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 15:55:35 EST)
• RESOLVED Re: sorta-OT graph snmp values Scott Weeks (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 16:39:49 EST)
• ADMIN: List FAQ/Monthly Post. NANOG Mail List Committee (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 17:41:12 EST)
• comcast price check John Martinez (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 23:26:00 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Steven King (Fri Feb 20 2009 - 23:45:48 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Andrew Prowant (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:36:37 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Owen DeLong (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 04:54:08 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Brielle Bruns (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 10:41:33 EST)
  • RE: comcast price check Blake Pfankuch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 11:15:18 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Steven King (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 11:52:23 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Steven M. Bellovin (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:02:21 EST)
  • RE: comcast price check Blake Pfankuch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:16:01 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check ChrisSerafin (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:46:22 EST)
  • RE: comcast price check Blake Pfankuch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 15:32:37 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Eric Gearhart (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 16:06:57 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Justin Wilson - MTIN (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 11:46:13 EST)
  • Re: comcast price check Chris Wallace (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 16:41:42 EST)
• Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Ryan A. Krenzischek (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 00:46:44 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Jeffrey Lyon (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:02:12 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Ryan A. Krenzischek (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:27:39 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Jeffrey Lyon (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 01:28:30 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Steve Pirk (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 02:18:17 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Sharma, Kapeel (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 02:44:18 EST)
    • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Jim Popovitch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 11:36:56 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Steven King (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:00:02 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Jim Popovitch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:49:56 EST)
  • Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check) Ryan A. Krenzischek (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 13:50:08 EST)
• Consumer broadband please move (was:Re: comcast price check) mike (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:15:04 EST)
  • RE: Consumer broadband please move (was:Re: comcast price check) Blake Pfankuch (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 12:22:07 EST)
  • Re: Consumer broadband please move (was:Re: comcast price check) Ryan A. Krenzischek (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:02:14 EST)
• T.38 IP carriers? Brian Feeny (Sat Feb 21 2009 - 14:52:19 EST)
• Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? neal rauhauser (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:28:37 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Roland Dobbins (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:39:19 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:46:28 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Randy Bush (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:47:57 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Richard Parker (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:54:20 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 01:55:31 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? neal rauhauser (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:11:16 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Chaim Rieger (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:26:13 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Roland Dobbins (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:34:53 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? neal rauhauser (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:37:25 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Gadi Evron (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:57:44 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Paul Wall (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 00:06:05 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Christopher Morrow (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 00:10:47 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Danny McPherson (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 00:15:11 EST)
  • Re: Great outage of 1997 - Does anyone recall? Gadi Evron (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 05:03:20 EST)
• SLAs for colo sites? Hank Nussbacher (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 02:28:43 EST)
• Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Marshall Eubanks (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 11:26:30 EST)
• Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re: comcast price check)] Paul M. Moriarty (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:02:39 EST)
• RE: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! (was: Re:comcast price check)] John van Oppen (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:08:05 EST)
• Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Seth Mattinen (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:09:31 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! JC Dill (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:26:24 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Patrick W. Gilmore (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:30:44 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Brandon Galbraith (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 13:45:13 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! JC Dill (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 14:34:52 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Jim Popovitch (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 14:48:19 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! JC Dill (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:00:24 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Brandon Galbraith (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:05:15 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! JC Dill (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 16:37:06 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Jim Popovitch (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 17:31:17 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! JC Dill (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 17:58:29 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! John Martinez (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 18:31:27 EST)
  • Re: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Jim Popovitch (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 18:35:45 EST)
• RE: Comcast - No complaints! [was: Re: Craptastic Service! Paul Stewart (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 15:06:13 EST)
• Global Crossing announcing prefixes they do not own Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Sun Feb 22 2009 - 21:13:33 EST)
• FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Bruce Grobler (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 03:22:03 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Elmar K. Bins (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 03:42:03 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Shon Elliott (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 03:48:03 EST)
  • RE: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Bruce Grobler (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 04:02:48 EST)
    • RE: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Ivan Pepelnjak (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 04:54:09 EST)
  • RE: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Moriniaux Michel (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 04:18:27 EST)
    • RE: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Bruce Grobler (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 04:28:17 EST)
      • Re: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Mark Smith (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 06:35:01 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X William Herrin (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 04:20:24 EST)
  • RE: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Tom Storey (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 18:02:28 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Nick Hilliard (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 18:08:43 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Chris Stebner (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 18:11:15 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Tom Storey (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 18:51:14 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Tom Storey (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 18:55:04 EST)
  • Re: FW: Ctrl+Shift+6 then X Nick Hilliard (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 19:17:13 EST)
• switch speed question Deric Kwok (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 10:08:26 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Brian Feeny (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 10:20:13 EST)
  • RE: switch speed question Bruce Grobler (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 04:33:14 EST)
    • Re: switch speed question Eric Gearhart (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 10:51:12 EST)
    • RE: switch speed question Holmes,David A (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 12:03:33 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Tony Varriale (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 11:04:36 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Roy (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 12:15:24 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Chris Adams (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 12:25:28 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question (no name) (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 14:51:31 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Tom Storey (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 04:58:20 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question David Barak (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 08:48:04 EST)
    • Re: switch speed question Tom Storey (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:13:01 EST)
    • Re: switch speed question Nathan Ward (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:15:27 EST)
  • Re: switch speed question Dave Israel (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:16:23 EST)
• NANOG in the news neal rauhauser (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:09:49 EST)
  • Re: NANOG in the news Tony Rall (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:26:42 EST)
  • Re: NANOG in the news neal rauhauser (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 13:43:15 EST)
• ISIS route summarization Jack Bates (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 16:26:06 EST)
  • RE: ISIS route summarization Ivan Pepelnjak (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 05:00:44 EST)
• Charter.net email routing issues John Martinez (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 19:36:28 EST)
  • Re: Charter.net email routing issues John Martinez (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 20:53:06 EST)
  • Re: Charter.net email routing issues Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mon Feb 23 2009 - 21:20:55 EST)
  • Re: Charter.net email routing issues Kameron Gasso (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 00:44:03 EST)
  • Re: Charter.net email routing issues Graeme Fowler (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 03:02:13 EST)
  • Re: Charter.net email routing issues Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 03:27:16 EST)
• Gmail down? Hank Nussbacher (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:05:37 EST)
  • Re: Gmail down? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:12:02 EST)
  • RE: Gmail down? Tobias Bartholdi (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:12:17 EST)
    • RE: Gmail down? Christian Schmuck (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:25:14 EST)
    • Re: Gmail down? Sarunas Vancevicius (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 07:16:54 EST)
  • Re: Gmail down? Stefan (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:52:15 EST)
  • Re: Gmail down? Murtaza (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 06:54:55 EST)
  • Re: Gmail down? Marshall Eubanks (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 07:16:16 EST)
  • Re: Gmail down? Luigi Iannone (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 08:06:12 EST)
  • RE: Gmail down? Bernd (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 08:11:44 EST)
    • Re: Gmail down? Henry Linneweh (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 09:24:58 EST)
• Re: ISIS route summarization (it's a wrap) Jack Bates (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 08:28:59 EST)
  • Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 09:48:46 EST)
    • Re: Illegal header length in BGP error Renaud RAKOTOMALALA (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 10:48:56 EST)
    • RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 10:50:14 EST)
    • RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Mills, Charles (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 10:53:56 EST)
    • Re: Illegal header length in BGP error Paul Cosgrove (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 12:26:13 EST)
    • RE: Illegal header length in BGP error Matthew Huff (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 12:29:29 EST)
• Routing issue to Lunarpages/California Regional Internet Clinton Popovich (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 13:30:07 EST)
  • RE: Routing issue to Lunarpages/California Regional Internet Murphy, Jay, DOH (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 15:27:10 EST)
• [NANOG-announce] NANOG 46 Call for Presentations Todd Underwood (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 13:59:17 EST)
• Yahoo and their mail filters.. Micheal Patterson (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 21:27:42 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Joe Abley (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 21:41:24 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Carlos Alcantar (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 21:50:20 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Erik (Caneris) (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 22:11:24 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Stefan Molnar (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 22:23:21 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Micheal Patterson (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 22:53:11 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 22:59:00 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Stefan Molnar (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 23:26:35 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Tue Feb 24 2009 - 23:31:52 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 06:41:44 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:26:33 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:36:12 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Eric Esslinger (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:47:36 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Richey (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:05:46 EST)
    • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:14:31 EST)
      • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Jo Rhett (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 23:26:12 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brielle Bruns (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:44:02 EST)
    • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Peter Beckman (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:08:11 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Tony Finch (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:08:29 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:14:14 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Seth Mattinen (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:18:23 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. mike (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:25:38 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Tony Finch (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:31:34 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:49:21 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Jeff Shultz (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:58:20 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Barry Shein (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:58:39 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Chuck Schick (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:18:09 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Micheal Patterson (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 14:03:42 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Micheal Patterson (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:31:16 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. mike (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:42:02 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. JC Dill (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:44:13 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. (no name) (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 14:17:14 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Peter Beckman (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:28:46 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brian Keefer (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:47:41 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John Levine (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:54:42 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Peter Beckman (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:08:16 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Tony Finch (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:28:40 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:05:30 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Zaid Ali (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:08:30 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brian Keefer (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:37:29 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. mark seiden-via mac (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:56:32 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Carlos Alcantar (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:38:37 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 20:25:03 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Barry Shein (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 22:29:23 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 22:44:56 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Paul M. Moriarty (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 22:57:18 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 22:59:15 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Barry Shein (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 23:07:46 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 23:34:09 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Matthew Petach (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 23:56:22 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Rich Kulawiec (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 07:14:48 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John R. Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:47:18 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Tony Finch (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 08:57:18 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:39:30 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:57:11 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:59:58 EST)
    • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brian Keefer (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 10:57:25 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John R. Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 11:28:14 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Steven Champeon (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 11:45:31 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Alexander Harrowell (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 12:05:26 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Marshall Eubanks (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 12:16:49 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brian Keefer (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 13:30:08 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. John R. Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:00:44 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:11:13 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Marshall Eubanks (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 17:06:41 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. J.D. Falk (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 20:08:27 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Carl Ford (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 20:35:57 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. J.D. Falk (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 20:15:08 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 21:04:46 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Brian Keefer (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 23:17:37 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ray Corbin (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 08:34:36 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo and their mail filters.. Ken A (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 10:10:10 EST)
• slightly OT: wall mount UPS for demarc Peter Pauly (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 09:57:35 EST)
  • RE: slightly OT: wall mount UPS for demarc (no email) (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:41:30 EST)
  • RE: slightly OT: wall mount UPS for demarc Dominic J. Eidson (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:47:15 EST)
  • Re: slightly OT: wall mount UPS for demarc Jay Hennigan (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:19:07 EST)
• Legislation and its effects in our world Jim Willis (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:06:05 EST)
  • RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Legislation and its effects in our world - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses Rod Beck (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:09:38 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world David Stearns (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:30:15 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Fred Baker (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 10:58:33 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Sean Hunter (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:12:41 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Ernie Rubi (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:26:37 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Fred Baker (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:06:13 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Ernie Rubi (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:24:14 EST)
  • Re: Legislation and its effects in our world Steven M. Bellovin (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 14:55:59 EST)
• Music Industry vs ISPs Michele Neylon :: Blacknight (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 11:41:37 EST)
• Peering Wars of 1998 (no name) (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 13:16:13 EST)
  • Re: Peering Wars of 1998 J.D. Falk (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 19:57:03 EST)
• [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Gadi Evron (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:35:14 EST)
  • Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Eric Gearhart (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:40:03 EST)
  • Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Jack Bates (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 17:00:00 EST)
  • Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) jamie rishaw (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 17:23:02 EST)
  • Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Eric Gearhart (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 21:51:35 EST)
  • Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Gadi Evron (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 02:19:47 EST)
• Anybody from Godaddy abuse? Jeremy Hanmer (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 15:43:23 EST)
• Re: Yahoo and their mail filters... Roger Marquis (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 16:21:57 EST)
• ethr.net contact? Paul Visscher (Wed Feb 25 2009 - 21:36:57 EST)
• Problem With E1 Shivlu Jain (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 04:04:40 EST)
  • RE: Problem With E1 Howard C. Berkowitz (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 07:36:31 EST)
    • RE: Problem With E1 Graham, Darel (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 07:50:39 EST)
  • RE: Problem With E1 Durrani, Mo (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 11:03:13 EST)
  • Re: Problem With E1 Shivlu Jain (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 01:18:45 EST)
• Re: AOL, was Yahoo and their mail filters.. John R. Levine (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 09:16:25 EST)
• Documentation of switch maps Blake Pfankuch (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:01:18 EST)
  • RE: Documentation of switch maps Bielawa, Daniel W. (NS) (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:06:58 EST)
  • Re: Documentation of switch maps Ingo Flaschberger (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:11:16 EST)
  • RE: Documentation of switch maps Gregory Boehnlein (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 14:20:07 EST)
  • Re: Documentation of switch maps Adam Armstrong (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 18:55:38 EST)
  • Re: Documentation of switch maps Gergely Antal (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 02:44:27 EST)
• Internet access using VRF aware NAT devang patel (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 19:38:18 EST)
  • Re:Internet access using VRF aware NAT Shivlu Jain (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 01:00:54 EST)
• Road Runner DNS servers Ricardo Oliveira (Thu Feb 26 2009 - 23:47:35 EST)
• BGP Update Report (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 06:00:05 EST)
• The Cidr Report (no name) (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 06:00:02 EST)
• Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 13:15:17 EST)
• [SANOG] Weekly Routing Table Report Routing Analysis Role Account (Fri Feb 27 2009 - 13:15:17 EST)
• 23456 without AS4_PATH? Saku Ytti (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 08:24:12 EST)
  • Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? (no name) (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 08:52:30 EST)
  • Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? Egor Zimin (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 11:38:31 EST)
  • Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? (no name) (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 12:05:34 EST)
  • Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? Saku Ytti (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 12:15:29 EST)
• MAC address confusion Saku Ytti (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 11:50:22 EST)
  • Re: MAC address confusion Grzegorz Banasiak (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 12:22:33 EST)
  • Re: MAC address confusion JAKO Andras (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 16:38:14 EST)
    • Re: MAC address confusion Saku Ytti (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 17:40:00 EST)
• ISP network re-design feedback requested Steve Bertrand (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 15:30:27 EST)
• Re: DPI or Flow Management Steve Bertrand (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 17:02:19 EST)
• Can I know how this network works out? Deric Kwok (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:05:37 EST)
• Can I know how this network works (resend)? Deric Kwok (Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:07:50 EST)

Last message date: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:09:54 EST
Archived on: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 21:09:55 EST

1272 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]