Re: IPv6 routing /48s

From: Mark Andrews (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 21:18:26 EST

  • Next message: jamie rishaw: "ip access-list e no-nanog-bs (Was Re: Public Assertions)"

    In message <>, Niels Bakker writes:
    > * (Mark Andrews) [Wed 26 Nov 2008, 02:57 CET]:
    > > 2002::/16 vs non 2002::/16 should be in the policy table. This is the
    > > default prefer ipv6 policy table for FreeBSD 6.4-PRERELEASE. There is
    > > also a alternate prefer ipv4 policy table that will be set if IPv6 is
    > > disabled.
    > >
    > > Prefix Prec Label Use
    > > ::1/128 50 0 0
    > > ::/0 40 1 4997
    > > 2002::/16 30 2 0
    > > ::/96 20 3 0
    > > ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 10 4 0
    >
    > I believe that is used for local address selection, not for sorting DNS
    > replies.

            It's used for both.
     
    > -- Niels.

    -- 
    Mark Andrews, ISC
    1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
    PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: 
    

  • Next message: jamie rishaw: "ip access-list e no-nanog-bs (Was Re: Public Assertions)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD