From: Jeff Shultz (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 15:13:54 EST
Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side?
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 wrote:
>> > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter
>> > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
>> > that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
>> > please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal
>> > replies to government inqueries. it can only strengthen
>> > your case if you tell the truth.
>> Equally but differently untruthful in my case. Myself, I don't sit around
>> my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
> then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
> knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
> myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
> my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted
> comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS. telling us lies is one thing,
> factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i
> fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
> in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
> the evidence. Dean, care to amend your statements?
-- Jeff Shultz