Re: Public Assertions

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 13:45:57 EST

  • Next message: Jeff Shultz: "Re: Public Assertions"

    On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
    > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 wrote:
    > > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter
    > > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
    > > that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
    > >
    > > please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal
    > > replies to government inqueries. it can only strengthen
    > > your case if you tell the truth.
    >
    > Equally but differently untruthful in my case. Myself, I don't sit around
    > my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
    >
    > -Bill

            then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
            knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
            myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.

            my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted
            comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS. telling us lies is one thing,
            factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i
            fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.

            in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
            the evidence. Dean, care to amend your statements?

    --bill


  • Next message: Jeff Shultz: "Re: Public Assertions"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD