From: Suresh Ramasubramanian (no email)
Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 00:20:30 EST
And the guy who is doing this is also an XO downstream as I see.. and
I have a feeling he wont like the consequences of what he did .. but
meanwhile, operationally speaking, my 40 million ++ users would be
glad if these fake announcements could get cut off at the knees
Head, Antispam Operations
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> Yes we are on the phone with xo - but meanwhile several other
> operators have been picking it up.
> As for operational impact - we're Outblaze.com - thats mail.com,
> register.com hosted domains etc, email for 40 million users or so.
> That makes us, lemme see, quite a bit larger than people like Comcast,
> I hope that helps the community decide whether or not to accept these
> bogus blackhole prefixes
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM, kris foster <> wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>> If you see 126.96.36.199/24 being announced from any other prefix than
>>> XO (2828 I guess) please ignore it. Especially if you see it
>>> announced from 19318 or 14037.
>> You're unlikely to get any reasonable response or action here. The best
>> course of action is to work through XO. You are their customer, and it is
>> their address space, right?
>> For what it's worth 188.8.131.52/24 was advertised recently but as a
>> community we have no way of knowing the validity of it, or the operational
>> (not speaking as MLC)
> Suresh Ramasubramanian ()
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian ()