Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length

From: Eugeniu Patrascu (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2008 - 10:27:03 EST

  • Next message: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length"

    Joe Abley wrote:

    > But surely he's not an end-user. He's an ISP, which means he's
    > (potentially) an LIR.
    >

    My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from RIPE to start
    testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a
    dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch on IPv6 BGP
    neighbors and update the DNS.

    But at almost 10.000 EUR per year it's an experiment I can't afford.


  • Next message: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD