Re: IPv6 routing /48s

From: Joe Abley (no email)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2008 - 18:47:44 EST

  • Next message: Owen DeLong: "Re: IPv6 routing /48s"

    On 2008-11-17, at 17:46, wrote:

    > Are there any parties out there routing /48 IPv6 networks globally?

    Yes. Some particularly visible examples are root and TLD server
    operators. There are some TLDs which are well-served by IPv6-capable
    nameservers, but which would be completely invisible to v6-only
    clients if their covering /48s were not accepted.

    ASes which refuse prefixes longer than 32 bits across the board as a
    matter of policy are broken.

    The last time I looked, the RIRs with v6 micro-assignment policies
    were all doing long-prefix assignments from an easy-to-identify range
    of addresses. Creating a general-purpose filter which lets through PI /
    48s but drops PA/deaggregated /48s is not rocket science.

    > I ran
    > into a supposed Catch-22 with Verizon and IPv6 address space and was
    > looking for clarification.

    I was once told by another large carrier I was trying to buy from in
    Miami that "you are not allowed to announce your own addresses in
    IPv6; you have to use addresses from your upstream".

    While the goal of encouraging use of PA addresses and discouraging
    deaggregation may be noble and good, it seems more education is
    required in some areas. "There is such a thing as PI in IPv6", for
    example, and perhaps "just because it's a /48 doesn't mean it's not PI".

    Joe


  • Next message: Owen DeLong: "Re: IPv6 routing /48s"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD