Re: Potential Prefix Hijack

From: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2008 - 07:48:22 EST

  • Next message: Raymond Dijkxhoorn: "Re: Potential Prefix Hijack"

    >
    > Hi!
    >
    > > We were hijacked aswell, by 27664 16735
    > >
    > > Our affected prefixes were:
    > >
    > > 94.46.0.0/16
    > > 194.88.142.0/23
    > > 194.11.23.0/24
    > > 82.102.0.0/18
    > > 195.246.238.0/23
    > > 194.107.127.0/24
    > > 81.92.192.0/19
    > > 193.227.238.0/23
    > >
    > > We are trying to contact them in order to get some feedback, and some good explanation for this.
    >
    > The obviously were leaking full routing, are we all gonna annnounce 'my
    > prefix was in there also?'
    >
            ACTUALLY............ They didn't hijack ALL my netblocks... I have 3. One was completely
    untouched, 1 was only hijacked by 1 site, and the last was hijacked by 2 different sites. :)

                            Tuc


  • Next message: Raymond Dijkxhoorn: "Re: Potential Prefix Hijack"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD