From: Eddy Martinez (no email)
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 17:43:53 EST
I second the TACACS+
Thats what you want. Same effort for the most part, to implement.
On Nov 7, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Steven King wrote:
> I disagree with the RADIUS suggestion. TACACS+ is a much more secure
> protocol. It encrypts the packet contents and has a more secure
> handshake procedure.
> Leslie wrote:
>> The best answer actually does seem to be to use freeradius instead of
>> tacacs, so I will probably go with that (though if anyone has any
>> tips on freeradius, please, let me know)
>> On Nov 7, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Leslie wrote:
>>> Hi --
>>> We are currently trying to set up a TACACS server for authentication
>>> to our network gear and have it run on suse linux hosts. Does
>>> have any advice/good webpages or guides regarding this?
>>> Thank you very much in advance!
> Steve King
> Network Engineer - Liquid Web, Inc.
> Cisco Certified Network Associate
> CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional
> CompTIA A+ Certified Professional