Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)

From: Scott Weeks (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 17:46:27 EST

  • Next message: Alexander Harrowell: "Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs r equesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)"

    --- wrote:

    That having been said, jurisdiction is a red herring. Every
    transit-free provider does at least some of its business in the United
    States. Economic reality compels them to continue to do so for the
    foreseeable future. That's all the hook the Feds need.
    ---------------------------------------------

    Are you saying that if any part of a network touches US soil it can be regulated by the US govt over the entirety of the network? For my part, this is not an attempt to change the subject or divert the argument (red herring). It is a valid question with operational impact.

    scott


  • Next message: Alexander Harrowell: "Re: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs r equesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD