RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts

From: Church, Charles (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 11:34:16 EST

  • Next message: david raistrick: "RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts"

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [mailto:]
    Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:52 AM
    To:
    Subject: RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts

    > what you're calling a political failure could be what others
    > call a rate war.

    I didn't really care about this, but now I'm curious. Since their
    peering was a 'trial', I'm assuming it hasn't always been there. Prior
    to Sprint and Cogent peering directly with each other, how did they
    communicate? Why was that functionality broken after they started
    peering?


  • Next message: david raistrick: "RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD