Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts

From: Charles Gucker (no email)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2008 - 07:58:46 EST

  • Next message: Charles Gucker: "Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts"

    On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Paul Wall <> wrote:
    > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <> wrote:
    >> 1. Neither Sprint nor Cogent have transit
    >> Both Sprint & Cogent are transit-free networks. (Notice how I carefully
    >> avoided saying "tier one"?)
    >
    > How do you explain Cogent's arrangement with NTT (AS 2914)? If it's
    > not transit, what is it?

    So you are asking to have what was Cogent's arrangement with NTT?
    That's like asking what was AOL's relationship with Level(3) when they
    had their peering spat with Sprint. Just because a relationship
    existed in the past does not mean the same relationship exists today.
      Accept the fact that both providers are transit free and move
    forward.

    > Does Akamai have peering arrangements with Cogent directly?

    Akamai are self declared peering sluts. So, yes, they have direct
    peering arrangements with Cogent.

    charles


  • Next message: Charles Gucker: "Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD