Re: the Intercage mess

From: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (no email)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 10:21:56 EDT

  • Next message: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.: "Re: Recall: the NANOG mess"

    Rich Kulawiec wrote:
    > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:10:42PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
    >> I said _new_ approach. I agree that it was overdue, but they are being
    >> cooperative with the anti-abuse community, so I think it is appropriate
    >> to give them an opportunity to deliver on their promise.
    >
    > We did that. In 2003. And the abuse continued, and got worse.
    >
    > We did that. In 2004. And the abuse continued, and got worse.
    >
    > We did that. In 2005. And the abuse continued, and got worse.
    >
    > And so on.
    >
    > I suggest at least making a perfunctory effort to acquaint yourself with
    > the long, sordid history of Atrivo/Intercage, and its numerous prior
    > (and utterly specious) claims of "cooperation" and "reform" before
    > commenting further.

    What was the deal about doing the same thing over and over and over and
    over, each time expecting the outcome to be different?


  • Next message: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.: "Re: Recall: the NANOG mess"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD