From: Joel Jaeggli (no email)
Date: Sun May 04 2008 - 20:59:19 EDT
Notwithstanding that fact that keepalives are a huge issue for tiny
battery powered devices. There's a false economy in assuming those
packets wouldn't have to be sent with IPV6...
Marc Manthey wrote:
> evening all ,
>
> found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
>
> -
>
> Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
>
> http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.pdf
>
>
> still interested in other links and publications
>
>
> regards
>
> Marc
>
> --
> "Use your imagination not to scare yourself to death
> but to inspire yourself to life."
>
> Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment
> Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation
> Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany
> Tel.:0049-221-3558032
> Mobil:0049-1577-3329231
> jabber :
> blog : http://www.let.de
> ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org
> xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
|
|
|