Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?

From: Kevin Blackham (no email)
Date: Sat May 03 2008 - 15:23:15 EDT

  • Next message: Steve Gibbard: "Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?"

    We did that with our internally anycasted recursors at my former
    network. A script withdraws the routes if bind isn't answering. Works
    great.

    On 5/3/08, Mike Lewinski <> wrote:
    > David Coulson wrote:
    > > Depends - It doesn't help if the DNS server is dead, but the front-end
    > > is still advertising the routes.
    >
    > Possibly a good argument for allowing the DNS servers to originate the
    > routes for them...? I've seen configuration where the routes were
    > injected based on link state via crossover cable, so at least if the
    > whole machine pukes the route is dropped. But if the resolver or OS
    > itself is just hung then yeah...
    >
    > Mike
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > NANOG mailing list
    >
    > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
    >

    _______________________________________________
    NANOG mailing list

    http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


  • Next message: Steve Gibbard: "Re: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD