Re: [NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion

• Previous message: Patrick W. Gilmore: "Re: [NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Leber: "[NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Next in thread: Mikael Abrahamsson: "Re: [NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

All,

Patrick is correct - the subscriber count is just north of 10k; likely
far greater readership considering web archives, remailers, etc.

- Tim

On 5/2/08, Patrick W. Gilmore <> wrote:
> On May 2, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Marc Manthey wrote:
>
> >> P.S.
> >> 10K of your not-so-close friends?
> >
> > does this mean this list has 10.000 subscribers ?
>
> I've heard all kinds of numbers, you can probably dig something out of
> the archives.
>
> But my understanding is there are far greater than 10K mailboxes which
> receive NANOG, especially if you include exploders. Could someone
> from the mail admin team confirm?
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list

http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

• Previous message: Patrick W. Gilmore: "Re: [NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Leber: "[NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Next in thread: Mikael Abrahamsson: "Re: [NANOG] fair warning: less than 1000 days left to IPv4 exhaustion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]