Re: Customer-facing ACLs

From: Chris Marlatt (no email)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2008 - 10:10:23 EDT

  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: Customer-facing ACLs"

    Dave Pooser wrote:
    >
    > Do bots try brute force attacks on Telnet and FTP? All I see at my firewall
    > are SSH attacks and spam. But sure, if there's a lot of Telnet abuse block
    > 23 too; I think it's used about as rarely by "normal" customers as SSH is.
    >

    Depending on the ip space I find FTP brute force attacks 10 times more
    common than SSH attacks. There really isn't a blanket rule you can impose.

    On a different note, unless you clearly advertise that you're offering
    filtered services I don't really find the practice ethical - and no a
    tiny line in the TOS doesn't really cut it IMHO.

    That doesn't mean it can't be done, simply spin the imposed ACL as a
    value-add and that your customers are now on a "safer internet".

    Regards,

            Chris


  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: Customer-facing ACLs"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD