Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs)

From: Jason Lixfeld (no email)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2008 - 15:49:49 EDT

  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs)"

    So the overwhelming question for me is why? Is it simply the fact
    that the native *nix underpinnings are where most users (within the
    aforementioned demographic) spend most of their time anyway?

    That's what did it for me - repeated attempts to get FreeBSD to run
    stable on the Inspiron I had at the time.

    Note: The question isn't what's better, the question is what got all
    us router and systems jockeys so interested in the first place.

    If this is too OT (or has the potential to become so), feel free to
    kill it.

    On 9-Mar-08, at 3:29 PM, Randy Bush <> wrote:

    >
    > i am moving to a macbook pro, or trying to, from a freebsd/winxp. but
    > why did they have to 'add value' by mucking with freebsd and
    > breaking my
    > fingers? and whoever thought the mac screen was good never used my
    > alienware 1920x1024.
    >
    > at the ipv4 econ meet on tasman last week, macs were in extreme
    > majority.
    >
    > randy


  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD