Re: Aggregation for IPv4-compatible IPv6 address space

From: Joe Abley (no email)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 12:10:45 EST

  • Next message: Lou Katz: "Re: Fourth cable damaged in Middle Eest (Qatar to UAE)"

    On 4-Feb-2008, at 00:19, Scott Morris wrote:

    > You mean do you have to express it in hex?

    There are two related things here: (a) the ability to represent a 32-
    bit word in an IPv6 address in the form of a dotted-quad, and (b) the
    legitimacy of an IPv6 address of the form ::A.B.C.D, where A.B.C.D is
    an IPv4 address.

    (a) is a question about the presentation of IPv6 addresses. (b) is a
    question about the construction of IPv6 addresses to be used in packet
    headers.

    I believe (a) is still allowed. However, (b) is not allowed. Since (b)
    is not allowed, (a) is arguably not very useful.

    Joe


  • Next message: Lou Katz: "Re: Fourth cable damaged in Middle Eest (Qatar to UAE)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD