Blackholes and IXs and Completing the Attack.

From: Ben Butler (no email)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 19:07:15 EST

  • Next message: Danny McPherson: "Re: Blackholing traffic by ASN"

    Hi,

    I have been working away on remote trigger blackholing and community
    based client initiated blackholing into transit ASes. It got me
    thinking that while this works great with a handful of upstream transit
    peers it does not really scale very well at an Internet Exchange with a
    high overhead configuring things for many peers. Plus if your IX
    connection is saturated that means legitimate traffic must be getting
    degraded - even if your router is coping and blackholing the
    interconnect is still flat lined.

    The only ways into an AS are via transit, public IX or private
    interconnects. If we want to extend the blackholing to secure IXs peers
    as well as into transits.

    So my idea....

    Is to have an IX route reflector configured with ACLs locking it down to
    exclusively BGP with the IX peer IP of the member. The IX route
    reflector would be configured to have per peer prefix filters per peer
    auto generated from registered AS macro for each peer from the
    RIPE,ARIN,APNIC etc databases. This should mean the router will not
    accept announcements for any /32 that is not part of the routes
    announced by that AS (it would be even better to tie it down to a match
    on origin AS as well). Plus the router will only talk to IX peers - no
    global transit.

    This hopefully will ensure a relatively protected router that is only
    accessible from the edge routers we want and also secured to only accept
    filtered announcements for black holing and in consequence enable the
    system to be trusted similar to Team Cymaru.

    Then all a member AS of the exchange does is announce any /32 from their
    IP block that they would like other members to Null route in their AS to
    this reflector.

    There are people way smarter than me on this list and the above is not
    implemented at any of the IXs I am connected to, so why is the above a
    dumb idea / what have I missed that makes the above unworkable because
    it does seem kind of obvious now I have done some work with this.

    Kind Regards

    Ben Butler
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    C2 Internet Ltd
    Globe House, The Gullet, Nantwich, Cheshire, CW5 5RL

    E mailto:
    W http://www.c2internet.net/
    B1 http://c2internet.blogspot.com/
    B2 http://c2noc.blogspot.com/
    T +44-(0)845-658-0020
    F +44-(0)845-658-0070

    All quotes & services from C2 are bound by our standard
    terms and conditions which are available on our website at:

    http://www.c2internet.net/legal/main.htm#tandc

    C2 Internet Limited is a company registered in England and
    Wales with company number 03910154

    Our VAT Registration number is GB 752 7650 17


  • Next message: Danny McPherson: "Re: Blackholing traffic by ASN"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD