From: Frank Bulk (no email)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 21:28:05 EST
Pretty good in the generalities, but there are few finer technical points
that could be been precisely and accurately stated. One that comes to mind
was the MD5 reference, another was the "50% loss" when talking about
performing an optical split.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:47 PM
To:
Subject: potential hazards of Protect-America act
I wonder if this is on topic?
<http://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf>
Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act.
--Michael Dillon
|
|
|