- Previous message: Simon Leinen: "Re: v6 gluelessness"
- Maybe in reply to: Randy Bush: "v6 gluelessness"
- Next in thread: Christopher Morrow: "Re: v6 gluelessness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Edward Lewis (no email)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2008 - 09:48:04 EST
At 15:35 +0100 1/22/08, Simon Leinen wrote:
>(I think a well-known DNS implementation does or used to do it this
>Bad way, which was part of the reason that it sometimes locked on to a
>server with an unreachable IPv6 address and a fast-responding IPv4
>address - and of course it would always try the IPv6 address first )-:
Used to do - but even though fixes have been done (4 years ago),
there are still non-upgraded nodes out there.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Think glocally. Act confused.
|
|
|