Re: Cost per prefix [was: request for help w/ ATT and terminology]

From: David Barak (no email)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 18:14:35 EST

  • Next message: (no email): "RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial"

    Wouldn't a reasonable approach be to take the sum of a 6500/msfc2 and a 2851, and assume that the routing computation could be offloaded?

    The difficulty I have with this discussion is that the cost per prefix is zero until you need to change eigenstate, where there's a big cost, and then it goes back to zero again.

    Because this isn't really all that new a problem, most vendors try not to make devices which have no headroom at all - so kit in the lower category seems to be qualitatively different.
    -David

    Joe Greco wrote:
    >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Joe Greco wrote:
    >> > Given that the 3750 is not acceptable, then what exactly would you propose
    >> > for a 48 port multigigabit router, capable of wirespeed, that does /not/
    >> > hold a 300K+ prefix table? All we need is a model number and a price, and
    >> > then we can substitute it into the pricing questions previously posed.
    >> >
    >> > If you disagree that the 7600/3bxl is a good choice for the fully-capable
    >> > router, feel free to change that too. I don't really care, I just want to
    >> > see the cost difference between DFZ-capable and non-DFZ-capable on stuff
    >> > that have similar features in other ways.
    >>
    >> If using the 7600/3bxl as the cost basis of "the upgrade", you might as
    >> well compare it to the 6500/7600/sup2 or sup3b. Either of these would
    >> likely be what people buying the 3bxls are upgrading from, in some cases
    >> just because of DFZ growth/bloat, in others, to get additional features
    >> (IPv6).
    > I see a minor problem with that in that if I don't actually need a chassis
    > as large as the 6500/sup2, there's a bit of a hefty jump to get to that
    > platform from potentially reasonable lesser platforms. If you're upgrading,
    > though, it's essentially a discard of the sup2 (because you lose access to
    > the chassis), so it may be fair to count the entire cost of the sup720-3bxl.
    > Punching in 720-3bxl to Froogle comes up with $29K. Since there are other
    > costs that may be associated with the upgrade (daughterboards, incompatible
    > line cards, etc), let's just pretend $30K is a reasonable figure, unless
    > someone else has Figures To Share.
    > ... JG
    > --
    > Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
    > "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
    > won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
    > With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.

          ____________________________________________________________________________________
    Be a better friend, newshound, and
    know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


  • Next message: (no email): "RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD