From: Taran Rampersad (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2008 - 12:38:17 EST
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> As long as the companies convince people that the "cap" is large
> enough to be essentially the same as unmetered then most people won't
> care and will take the savings. The other angle is to convince the
> 95% of customers that caps will actually deliver them a faster speed
> as the "evil 5%ers" won't be slowing them down by hogging the bandwidth.
> Having a cap and slowing down afterward (64kbps or 128kbps are
> typical) is what worked here in Oz. It also removes a whole lot of
> credit related issues. Consumers get a product where they know what
> they're getting - it's fast upto a point and then it slows down.
This makes a lot of sense. And if it worked in Oz...
-- Taran Rampersad http://www.knowprose.com http://www.your2ndplace.com http://www.opendepth.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/knowprose/ "Criticize by Creating" - Michelangelo "The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine." - Nikola Tesla
|
|
|