RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial

From: Frank Bulk - iNAME (no email)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2008 - 21:43:02 EST

  • Next message: Nathan Ward: "Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US"

    Except if the cable companies want to get rid of the 5% of heavy users, they
    can't raise the prices for that 5% and recover their costs. The MSOs want
    it win-win: they'll bring prices for metered access slightly lower than
    "unlimited" access, making it attractive for a large segment of the user
    base (say, 80%), and slowly raise the unlimited pricing for the 15 to 20%
    that want that service, such that at the end of the day, the costs are less
    AND the revenue is greater.

     

    Frank

     

    From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Rod
    Beck
    Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 2:25 PM
    To: Scott McGrath; Rod Beck
    Cc: ; Patrick W. Gilmore;
    Subject: RE: An Attempt at Economically Rational Pricing: Time Warner Trial

     

    If service is metered, it doesn't imply 25 cents a minute. It would probably
    be based on bytes transferred and would probably be less expensive for the
    bulk of users than the current flat rate pricing. If the cable companies are
    telling the truth, roughly 5% of their customers generate 50% of the
    traffic. That implies that the bulk of users are effectively subsidising the
    five percent of heavy users.

    So any sort of well crafted usage-based pricing, would lower the amount paid
    by the vast majority of users and raise it dramatically for the five percent
    of heavy users.

    Usage-based pricing would give the cable companies and telephony incumbents
    an incentive to upgrade infrastructure and actually compete for the heavy
    users. The heavy users would be the most profitable customers. New
    technologies would be welcomed instead of discouraged.

    Ironically, the Net Neutrality debate is about the access providers trying
    to impose usage-based pricing through the backdor - on the content
    providers. It goes without saying I oppose it. It's the end users who decide
    what they view and hence ultimately generate the traffic flows. So the end
    users should be subject to the usage-based pricing.

    Regards,

    Roderick S. Beck
    Director of European Sales
    Hibernia Atlantic
    1, Passage du Chantier, 75012 Paris
    http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com
    Wireless: 1-212-444-8829.
    Landline: 33-1-4346-3209.
    French Wireless: 33-6-14-33-48-97.
    AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth

    ``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.'' Albert
    Einstein.


  • Next message: Nathan Ward: "Re: Network Operator Groups Outside the US"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD