Re: v6 gluelessness

From: David Conrad (no email)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2008 - 22:47:59 EST

  • Next message: Joe Greco: "Re: request for help w/ ATT and terminology"

    On Jan 18, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
    > Contact the TLD's. Send them two e-mails, and two faxes. But all
    > of those should contain "you have 30 days to object, or we will
    > move forward anyway".

    This is along the lines of what we're going to propose. It will be
    interesting to see what happens.

    > I'm all for giving people a reasonable way to object, and/or "protect"
    > the things they run. I think though giving them an opportunity to
    > stop any process completely in its tracks is, well, stupid.

    I've heard this opinion stated (usually by technical folks) quite
    frequently. Trust me when I say I don't disagree. It is interesting
    (in the 'Ebola virus' form of interesting) to see what happens when
    international politics and apolitical technology intersect...

    > I'd get involved in making the process less stupid, but frankly IANA
    > politics make my head hurt. :)

    And you thought I was grumpy just by nature? :-)

    Regards,
    -drc


  • Next message: Joe Greco: "Re: request for help w/ ATT and terminology"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD