Re: [admin] Using the NANOG list as a paging mechanism

From: Perry E. Metzger (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2008 - 17:01:18 EST

  • Next message: Jeff Aitken: "Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?"

    "Martin Hannigan" <> writes:
    > We'd like to politely note that paging each other on the list without
    > content or context is generally off-topic.

    I understand the motivation, but I think the "paging" messages should
    be allowed.

    I've done it myself, in desperation after exhausting all other ways to
    find a needed contact. I don't think that the current rate of
    "desperately searching for contact at provider X" is impossibly high,
    and often this is the only way to find a contact you really, really
    need. Certainly people should be encouraged to try all other
    possibilities first, but what if you already have?

    > These messages are perceived by many as fragments that are not
    > useful to the wider community.

    Compared to most of the other traffic here, they're actually
    useful. The endless debates haven't helped me much over the years, but
    the couple of times I've really, really needed to find an appropriate
    contact and had no luck any other way, this list has come through for me.

    > If you could provide some level of detail as to why you are
    > using the list to reach someone, it would be much appreciated.

    In my own instances, posting private security related information to
    the internet seemed like a bad idea, so I must politely refuse.

    -- 
    Perry E. Metzger		
    

  • Next message: Jeff Aitken: "Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD