From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2008 - 15:23:32 EST
> Broadband has of course changed that, when you sell a broadband service,
> you have to assume that the customer will be connected 24x7, so you
> need as many IPv4 addresses as you've got customers - and the same will
> apply for IPv6. Why do dynamic when you don't need to?
There are several other arguments for dynamic addresses, for instance:
- Dynamic addresses often make it easier to perform bulk moves of large
numbers of customers.
- Dynamic addresses for residential customers is a way to justify higher
cost (and profit) for a "business" type service with static addresses.
Given that many service providers find dynamic addresses for residential
customers extremely convenient, *independent of the number of available
addresses*, is there any reason to believe this will change with IPv6?
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting,
|
|
|