Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?

From: James Hess (no email)
Date: Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:46:51 EST

  • Next message: Joe Greco: "Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?"

    On Dec 31, 2007 3:26 PM, Church, Charles <> wrote:

    > like a natural choice, leaving 80 bits for network addressing. This
    > waste of space seems vaguely familiar to handing out Class A netblocks
    > 20+ years ago. "We'll never run out"... Maybe it's just me though.

    The comparison is mistaken. Not without a major fundamental change in
    the way ip addresses are used (ridiculous waste of addresses by
    end-sites causing them
    to require numerous subnets and request additional /48s)

    IPv6 provides ample room for growth at end sites, and giving out /32s
    or so to ISPs
    and telling them to hand out /48s and /56s seems reasonably conservative.
    64-bits maximum length network address. It's not much a waste for
    every end-user to get a /56

    Think of it as IPv4, but instead of everyone having gotten a Class A,
    every end site
    got on average 0.00000006 of an IPv4 /32 (host address), no matter
    how large their site.

    1 IPv4 Class A is approximately 0.39% of available IPv4 space
    1.67*10^7/(4.29*10^9)

    1 IPv6 /48 is approximately 0.00000000000000000000827% of available
    IPv6 space.
    You need a calculator for that second one :)

    But assignable space in V6 could be exhausted without end-site IPs running out.

    The place where major problems could be run into is deciding how big a
    block your ISPs and
    LIRs get, or if the registries are entertaining the concept of PI
    space for v6.. how large
    those blocks are. Does a small ISP ever get such a small block that
    they may run out of /48s
    to assign?

    Does a large ISP ever get such a large block, the RIRs may run out of
    ISP blocks to assign?

    Both situations would be extremely undesirable.

    In the former case, they need multiple blocks, but RIR policy for v6
    might not provide a way
    for them to get that.... the utilization of additional allocations
    also add undesirable complexity
    to networks, which is very bad: design of IPv6 is supposed to avoid
    such things.

    In the latter case... IPv6 IP addresses have not been 'exhausted',
    but now, there can now
    be no new ISPs or PI allocations; everything having been assigned to
    some major provider
    who has not given out very many of their /48s yet,

    or who is giving out /56s and hording the rest of the address space,
    never to be assigned.....

    --
    -J
    

  • Next message: Joe Greco: "Re: Assigning IPv6 /48's to CPE's?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD