- Previous message: Chris Cole: "RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE"
- In reply to: Chris Cole: "RE: IEEE 40GE & 100GE"
- Next in thread: Owen DeLong: "Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Stephen Sprunk (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2007 - 16:51:43 EST
Thus spake "Chris Cole" <>
> The 40km/10km cost ratio is between 1.6x and 2x, depending on
> the source.
>
> The 10km/4km cost ratio is between 1.15x and 1.3x, again
> depending on the source.
If those numbers translate into prices (not costs), then I'd prefer to see
40km and 4km optics, with no 10km optics. The important point is that the
40km optics neet to be able to handle 4.1km links with no attenuators,
preferably without any human tuning at all. You only pay the extra capital
cost once (if there even is any, due to more volume of fewer parts), but you
pay labor and sparing over and over.
S
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
|
|
|