IEEE 40GE & 100GE

From: Bora Akyol (no email)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2007 - 19:35:03 EST

  • Next message: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE"

    IEEE is seeking feedback from network operators etc on the reach
    requirements for 40GE & 100GE.

    If you have direct feedback to give, please contact Chris Cole directly
    (email address below).

    This is very important as it will directly impact how much you pay for those
    soon to be cherished 40 & 100 GE hardware in the future. I believe
    information on how many patch panel connections you expect the links to go
    through is also highly valued.

    Regards

    Bora

    ------ Forwarded Message
    From: Chris Cole <>
    Reply-To: Chris Cole <>
    Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:21:31 -0800
    To: <>
    Conversation: [HSSG] Reach Ad Hoc
    Subject: Re: [HSSG] Reach Ad Hoc

    During the November HSSG meeting, optics vendors made a presentation
    proposing changing the 10km reach objective to 3km or 4km. One of my
    motivations for working on the proposal was informal input from a number
    of 100GE end users that >90% of their data center and short interconnect
    needs would be met by a reach objective less then 4km (versus 10km.)
    With such a reach distribution, a 4km or less optimized reach objective
    would result in overall cost savings.

    As part of the HSSG effort to review this proposal, numerous requests,
    both informal as well as from the HSSG chair and Reach Ad Hoc chair,
    have been made for contributions to quantify the 10km and under reach
    distribution. While the optics vendors as suppliers can accurately
    represent the relative costs of optics alternatives, they can not
    represent end user requirements.

    To date, we have seen no end user presentation or data supporting
    changing the 10km reach objective to 4km or less. Unless such
    contributions are forthcoming, it is likely that there will be no
    motivation to make the change. This sentiment can be seen in the 12/7
    Reach Ad Hoc conference call minutes.

    I would encourage any HSSG participant that views their volume 100GE SMF
    needs as better met by a 4km or shorter reach objective to make a
    contribution containing reach distribution data in support of this
    position. Otherwise we will move forward with the existing approved
    objectives.

    Chris

    ________________________________________

    From: Andy Moorwood [mailto:]
    Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:03 AM
    To:
    Subject: [HSSG] Reach Ad Hoc

    Colleagues, the meeting notes from our call last week are now posted on
    the IEEE website
    http://www.ieee802.org/3/hssg/public/reach/MeetingNotes_r1_1207.pdf
    Thank you for your contributions
    Andy

    ------ End of Forwarded Message


  • Next message: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: IEEE 40GE & 100GE"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD