Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...

From: Steven M. Bellovin (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2007 - 08:19:30 EST

  • Next message: Martin Hannigan: "[admin] Errors to NANOG list subscribers"

    On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:46:08 -0800
    "Christopher Morrow" <> wrote:

    >
    > On 11/5/07, Eliot Lear <> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > Cough. So, how much is that NXDOMAIN worth to you?
    >
    > So, here's the problem really... NXDOMAIN is being judged as a
    > 'problem'. It's really only a 'problem' for a small number of
    > APPLICATIONS on the Internet. One could even argue that in a
    > web-browser the 'is nxdomain a problem' is still up to the browser to
    > decide how best to answer the USER of that browser/application. Many,
    > many applications expect dns to be the honest broker, to let them know
    > if something exists or not and they make their minds up for the upper
    > layer protocols accordingly.
    >
    > DNS is fundamentally a basic plumbing bit of the Internet. There are
    > things built around it operating sanely and according to generally
    > accepted standards. Switching a behavior because you believe it to be
    > 'better' for a large and non-coherent population is guaranteed to
    > raise at least your support costs, if not your customer-base's ire.
    > Assuming that all the world is a web-browser is at the very least
    > naive and at worst wantonly/knowingly destructive/malfeasant.
    >
    > MarkA and others have stated: "Just run a cache-resolver on your local
    > LAN/HOST/NET", except that's not within the means of
    > joe-random-sixpack, nor is it within the abilities of many
    > enterprise/SMB folks, talking from experience chatting up misbehaving
    > enterprise/banking/SMB customers first hand. What's to keep the ISP
    > from answering: provider-server.com when they ask for Yahoo.com or
    > Google.com or akamai-deployed-server.com aside from (perhaps) a threat
    > of lawyers calling?

    Hey -- I can so run a cache/resolver...

    More seriously: you're right; most people can't and won't. But a
    majority of customers in that space are using small NATs. Those
    certainly can; in fact, they often do. It's just that today, they
    simply talk to their upstreams, rather than starting from the root and
    going down.

                    --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


  • Next message: Martin Hannigan: "[admin] Errors to NANOG list subscribers"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD