Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

• Previous message: Routing Analysis Role Account: "Weekly Routing Table Report"
• Maybe in reply to: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)"
• Next in thread: Owen DeLong: "Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:56:48 +0200, Mohacsi Janos said:

> controller can force enable/disable. I don't see how RIAA can lobby for
> switching off privacy enhancement - disabling certain component of the
> operating system?.

Consider the fact that they lobbied *and got* 17 USC 512 takedowns, and
the DMCA anti-circumvention clause.

Still don't see how they could lobby for it?

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

• Previous message: Routing Analysis Role Account: "Weekly Routing Table Report"
• Maybe in reply to: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)"
• Next in thread: Owen DeLong: "Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]