From: Church, Charles (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2007 - 23:59:54 EDT
-----Original Message-----
From: JAKO Andras [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:59 PM
To: Church, Charles
Cc:
Subject: RE: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG
Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
>An IPv6-only ISP with enough IPv4 addresses for its concurrent online
>users seems strange. Why wouldn't that ISP give those v4 addresses to
the
>online users instead of the NAT-PT box? And why do you call it
IPv6-only?
>Andras
Because not all users are online at the same time. Think back to the
days where you had x number of dialup lines for y number of subscribers.
It might be a 2:1 ratio. Maybe more, depending on how many time zones
an ISP serves. It's not a huge plus, but once IPv4 content providers
can see where x% of their web hits are coming from these NAT-PT blocks,
they might be more motivated to go dual-stack.
Chuck
|
|
|