Next message: Steve Gibbard: "Myanmar Internet turned off"
> break. It seems like an IPv6-only ISP would need to operate the NAT-PT
> boxes, and dedicate a block of v4 addresses the size of the expected
> concurrent online users to the NAT-PT box. Keep in mind that a v6 ISP
> with 1 million customers won't need a million v4 addresses, for obvious
> reasons. It's going to be considerably less than if each customer got a
> v4 address. NAT-PT does seem like a viable short term solution. I'm
An IPv6-only ISP with enough IPv4 addresses for its concurrent online
users seems strange. Why wouldn't that ISP give those v4 addresses to the
online users instead of the NAT-PT box? And why do you call it IPv6-only?
Andras
