From: Church, Charles (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2007 - 19:45:31 EDT
It's seems we're always confusing NAT with PAT (or NAT overload, or
whatever else you want to call it). One to one NAT rarely breaks stuff.
NAT-PT would need to follow that model, otherwise, yes, things will
break. It seems like an IPv6-only ISP would need to operate the NAT-PT
boxes, and dedicate a block of v4 addresses the size of the expected
concurrent online users to the NAT-PT box. Keep in mind that a v6 ISP
with 1 million customers won't need a million v4 addresses, for obvious
reasons. It's going to be considerably less than if each customer got a
v4 address. NAT-PT does seem like a viable short term solution. I'm
not sure though how to get current v4-only content providers to
dual-stack their stuff. Increased domain fees maybe for v4-only
domains...
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
Iljitsch van Beijnum
And then you'll see your active FTP sessions, SIP calls, RTSP
sessions, etc fail.
|
|
|